This is an article related to Nouvelle Alexandrie. Click here for more information.

New Alexandrian general election, 1759

From MicrasWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

New Alexandrian general election, 1759

1754 ←
15-17.IX.1759 AN

All 801 seats to the Federal Assembly
401 seats needed for a majority
  First party Second party Third party
 
Leader José Manuel Montero Marcos Ferreira Gonçalves Francisco Gabaza
Party Federal Humanist Party Democratic Socialist Party Federal Consensus Party
Alliance None Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie None
Leader since 1749 AN 1753 AN 1751 AN
Leader's seat Wechua Nation Santander Santander
Last election 372, 48.88% 196, 26.05% 119, 15.64%
Seats won 293 232 93
Seat change ▼ -79 ▲ +36 ▼ -26
Popular vote 119,711,462 94,903,277 38,076,196
Percentage 36.5% 29.0% 11.6%
Swing ▼ -12.3% ▲ +2.9% ▼ -4.0%

Fourth party Fifth party Sixth party
 
Leader Yuiza Bohi'o Elena Svensson Sofia Laurent
Party Wakara People's Party Civic Governance Alliance Republican Party of Oportia
Alliance Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie None None
Leader since 1755 AN 1753 AN 1750 AN
Leader's seat Boriquén (Regional Party) North Lyrica Oportia (Regional Party)
Last election 23, 3.34% 10, 1.82% Did not contest
Seats won 28 95 10
Seat change ▲ +5 ▲ +85 New
Popular vote 12,372,618 38,283,831 4,191,938
Percentage 3.8% 11.7% 1.3%
Swing ▲ +0.4% ▲ +9.9% New

Seventh party
 
Leader None
Party Independent


Alliance None


Leader since No leader
Leader's seat No leader
Last election 29, 4.28%
Seats won 50
Seat change ▲ +21
Popular vote 20,012,290
Percentage 6.1%
Swing ▲ +1.8%



President of the Government before election

José Manuel Montero (FHP)

President of the Government

Marcos Ferreira Gonçalves (AJNA)
(hung Assembly; Federal Accord coalition)

The New Alexandrian general election of 1759 was held from 15-17.IX.1759 AN to elect the members of the Federal Assembly, the lower house of the Cortes Federales. It was the 14th general election held since the founding of the Federation and the first contested in all thirteen Regions, following the accession of Oportia in XII.1755 AN. Deputies of the 13th Cortes Federales had been elected in 1754 AN for five-year terms, and the election fell at the natural expiry of that mandate.

Premier José Manuel Montero and the Federal Humanist Party (FHP) sought a third consecutive term. Montero's eligibility had been settled on 1.XII.1758 AN, when a binding national referendum rejected a two-term cap on the premiership by 64.0 percent to 36.0 percent, leaving the appointment rules of Article 30 of the Proclamation of Punta Santiago unchanged.[1] The government had held office since 1755 AN on a confidence-and-supply agreement with twelve Aldurian independent deputies rather than a majority of its own. The opposition was led by Marcos Ferreira Gonçalves of the Democratic Socialist Party (DSP), who chaired the Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) with the Wakara People's Party (WPP) under Yuiza Bohi'o. The Federal Consensus Party (FCP) under Francisco Gabaza and the Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) under Elena Svensson contested the election as the smaller national parties.

The election was the first at which Oportia returned deputies. The Region had acceded after the 1754 AN election and had held no seats in the Federal Assembly since, and its parties spent 1758 AN sorting themselves into the national party system: the Nationalist and Humanist Party merged into the FHP, the Democratic Restoration Coalition divided between the FCP and the DSP, and the Republican Party of Oportia alone chose to stand on its own regional list.[2] Following the 1758 New Alexandrian census, the first to enumerate Oportia, the Assembly was enlarged from 749 to 801 seats and re-apportioned across all thirteen Regions, its first expansion since 1744 AN.

Two conditions shaped the contest. The first was economic: the 1757 Alexandrium market crash and the Recession of 1757 that followed it cost the Treasury about NAX€55 billion a year in forecast revenue and drew the Federation's reserves four times. It also carried the government below the approval line in every quarterly poll since XII.1757 AN.[3] The second was a civil-liberties argument reopened in XIV.1758 AN, when the Federal Capital District Court granted Sofia Reyes a protective order against the Humanist Vanguard's torchlit lasso-and-noose marches. Vice-President of the Government Fred Strong declined to retract his blessing of the marches, and the FHP closed ranks behind him.[4]

The Federal Humanist Party finished as the largest party with 293 of the 801 seats but fell 108 short of a majority, its vote falling from 48.9 to 36.5 percent, and the election returned a hung 14th Cortes Federales. The Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie took 260 seats on 32.8 percent and carried seven Regions to the Humanists' five, the Federal Consensus Party holding Islas de la Libertad. The Civic Governance Alliance recorded the night's largest movement, rising from ten seats to 95 as the party-finance question it had carried through the term reached the country, and passed the Federal Consensus Party, which fell from 119 seats to 93. Independents returned 50 deputies and the Republican Party of Oportia entered the chamber with ten at Oportia's first federal vote, on a turnout of 87.9 percent. King Sinchi Roca II appointed Montero Formateur to attempt to form a government.[5]

Background

The 13th Cortes Federales has been an unusual term. A government without a majority of its own has held office for five years on the votes of twelve independents, lost one binding national referendum and won another, and spent its last two years managing the collapse of the commodity that funds the Federation. It has also seated a thirteenth Region that sends it no deputies. Each of those conditions carries into the 1759 AN election, and the account below takes them in turn.

The Montero government and the 13th Cortes

The 1754 general election returned the Federal Humanist Party with 372 of 749 seats, three short of a majority, on a turnout that fell from 91.22 percent to about 53 percent. Talks with the Civic Governance Alliance produced a preliminary coalition framework on 29.IX.1754 AN that would have carried the Clean Government Act, but Montero abandoned it on 22.X and signed a confidence-and-supply agreement with twelve Aldurian independents three days later. The agreement gave the government 384 votes on confidence and budget matters, a working majority of nine, and the CGA moved into opposition. The 13th Cortes Federales opened on 12.I.1755 AN and the government carried the Address in Reply 384 to 234, with the FCP's 119 deputies abstaining.

The twelve signatories registered as the Aldurian Independent Coalition on 13.XI.1754 AN under Coordinator Émile Bouchard. The Coalition has no whip and no policy program, and is bound only on confidence and supply; its remaining twenty independent colleagues sit as crossbenchers. That arrangement has held the government in office for the whole of the Cortes, and has left Alduria with a standing claim on federal spending that Bouchard has pressed at each of the term's fiscal tests.

The accountability agenda that the CGA had been formed to carry did not survive the term. Having stalled the Clean Government Act through the 12th Cortes and abandoned the coalition framework that would have passed it, the government defeated the CGA's Clean Government and Political Reform Act, 1754 in 1755 AN. Montero undertook to bring a measure of its own carrying the party-finance and electoral-integrity provisions the Pact of Shadows scandal had exposed. The Anti-Corruption Agency (Mandate and Resources) Act, 1756 carried none of them. It enlarged the Anti-Corruption Agency's powers and budget and passed its third reading on 17.IX.1756 AN by 712 votes to 14, while amendments from Tomás Iñiguez restoring donation disclosure, spending caps, a contractor-contribution ban, and public financing were defeated 251 to 449 with 49 abstentions. Elena Svensson said afterward that the Civic Governance Alliance would bring party finance back and make it the question of the 1759 AN election.[6]

The Alexandrium crash and the recession

Main article: Recession of 1757

The condition that has defined the second half of the term is economic. Across 1757 AN new supply outran demand as quota discipline frayed within the Euran Alexandrium Coordination Organization, and the price of Alexandrium broke on 5.XII.1757 AN, falling by roughly a quarter from a peak near NAX€2,900 a gram. Because the UARA levy is charged on weight rather than price, the headline figure held while everything indexed to value gave way. On 12.XIII.1757 AN the Treasury cut projected Alexandrium revenue for 1758 AN by about NAX€55 billion and described the gap as structural.[3]

Treasury Secretary Warren Ferdinand brought a revised budget on 8.I.1758 AN that protected the producing Regions rather than cutting into them, accelerated the Aldurian diversification program, added a transition measure for Oportia, and authorized drawing up to NAX€220 billion from the National Fiscal Reserve and Emergency Fund. It became law as the General Appropriations and Taxation Act, 1758 on 2.IV.1758 AN. Because the Act appropriated the year's revenue in full, no room remained for an unbudgeted rescue when the Federal Bank moved the Caisse Régionale de l'Alduria into mandatory intervention on 26.V.1758 AN.[3] Gonçalves has argued through the term that the budget did too little for the Regions, and Gabaza has attacked the repeated draws on the reserves. Bouchard has said the Coalition would judge each measure by what reached Alduria.

The National Resilience Fund referendum

Nine days after the crash, on 24.XII.1757 AN, a binding national referendum asked whether the Federation should establish a permanent National Resilience Fund against future disasters. It passed narrowly, 51.4 percent to 48.6 percent on a turnout of 41.8 percent, obliging a government that had opposed the Fund to build it and leaving its size, sources, and governance to the Cortes.[7] A special IOP/NBC poll taken on the eve of the vote found the government underwater for the first time, its net approval falling to minus eleven, which the pollsters attributed to Montero's refusal to state a position.[7]

The referendum did two things that bear on the 1759 AN election. It established that a national ballot could force action on a government that had opposed the measure put to the country, which is the model the term-limits campaign followed a year later. It also produced the last legislative fight of the Cortes. Gonçalves moved first with the National Resilience Fund Act, 1758 on 2.IV.1758 AN, and the government answered on 8.IV with the National Resilience Fund Establishment Act, 1758, which caps the Fund and gates its disbursement. The opposition bill did not reach the floor, and it is the government's design that is before the Federal Assembly for division, leaving the shape of the reserve the country voted for to be settled by the chamber the country is about to replace.

The term-limits referendum

The question of a third Montero term was put to the country directly. A binding referendum held on 1.XII.1758 AN, after seventy-two hours of voting, asked whether Article 30 of the Proclamation of Punta Santiago should be amended to limit service as Premier to two terms. It was rejected by 64.0 percent to 36.0 percent on a turnout of 41.1 percent, and carried in only four of the thirteen Regions.[1]

Retroactivity, not principle, divided the campaign. Gonçalves supported the amendment as published and argued that the FHP would remain free to contest 1759 AN under another prospective Premier. Montero opposed it on the ground that service completed under the existing constitution should not become a disqualification after the fact, while saying he supported a prospective limit and would respect the result. Bouchard supported a two-term limit but proposed counting Montero's current term as his first, which would have left the incumbent eligible for one further mandate; his condition was not a third ballot option.[8] The heaviest defeats came in FHP strongholds, where the amendment took under an eighth of the vote in the Isles of Caputia, North Lyrica, and New Caputia.

Vice-President of the Government Fred Strong condemned the initiation of constitutionally consequential questions by simple-majority referendum and called for the legislative basis for binding referendums to be reviewed by the Federal Assembly. With a second national referendum concluded inside a year, that review remained before the chamber as the Cortes approached its final session.

The Humanist Vanguard parades

Through the later months of 1758 AN, cadres of the Humanist Vanguard, the youth arm of the governing party, marched in the torchlit columns known as the Parade of Lassos and Nooses through the university quarters of Cárdenas and Parap and outside the home of Sofia Reyes, carrying lassos and nooses made from rope issued for knot-tying instruction. Reyes had been lassoed and dragged by a mounted gendarme during Operation Faun in 1750 AN, suffering a traumatic brain injury, three broken ribs, and permanent nerve damage; the government settled her suit for NAX€4.2 million in 1751 AN and dismissed twelve officers, admitting no wrongdoing. The Federal Gendarmerie policed the marches lightly.[4]

On 11.XIV.1758 AN the Federal Capital District Court granted Reyes a protective order against assemblies outside her home and directed the Gendarmerie to enforce it. Commissioner General Manuel Aristegui y Campos broke up the columns within a day and referred the force's earlier handling of them to its Bureau of Professional Integrity. Strong was confirmed to have given the marches his personal blessing and did not retract it; the Federal Humanist Party closed ranks behind him, defending the marches as lawful assembly. Opposition censure motions were tabled in the Cortes against the government's majority. Polling by the Institute of Public Opinion after the first images circulated found majorities opposed to the marches in every reported group, including FHP voters, and a plurality holding that the Gendarmerie had failed in its duty.[4]

The affair revived the argument that Operation Faun had first raised eight years earlier, and gave the opposition a civil-liberties case at the start of an election year. The Nouveau Wave, the recurring counterculture whose 1750 AN revival Operation Faun had been directed against, treats the parades and the court's answer to them as the movement's immediate political inheritance.

Oportia's first federal election

Main article: Oportia

Oportia became the Federation's thirteenth Region after the Oportian integration referendum, 1755, in which integration was approved by 57.0 percent to 43.0 percent, with the accession process concluding in XII.1755 AN. Because it acceded after the 1754 AN election, Oportia has returned no deputies to the Federal Assembly. Its 16,176,000 electors first voted federally at the 1757 AN National Resilience Fund referendum, and at the 1758 AN term-limits referendum the Region came nearer than any other to approving the cap and still rejected it, 50.8 percent to 49.2 percent.[1]

On 14.XIII.1758 AN the Region's parties announced how they would contest the federal ballot. The Nationalist and Humanist Party, which had led the 1755 AN campaign against accession, agreed to merge into the Federal Humanist Party on the ground that both belonged to the same Humanist movement. The Democratic Restoration Coalition announced that it would divide, its social-democratic majority joining the Democratic Socialists and the centrist wing of Regional Governor Clementina Duffy Carr joining the Federal Consensus Party. The technocratic Civic Reform Alliance aligned with the Civic Governance Alliance and the New Left of Oportia with the Democratic Socialists. The Republican Party of Oportia alone declined to fold into a national party and will contest 1759 AN on its own Oportian list as the Region's autonomist voice of the right.[2]

Electoral system

The Federation elects the Federal Assembly by proportional representation within each Region, using the Sainte-Laguë method to convert votes into seats. Regions vote as single at-large constituencies on open lists; there is no national list and no constituency smaller than a Region. A party must take 2 percent of the vote in a Region to share in that Region's seats, and independent candidates are exempt from the threshold. The voting age is 18.

Deputies serve five-year terms. A term ends on the fifth anniversary of the election or on the dissolution of the Cortes, whichever comes first. Under Article 31 of the Proclamation of Punta Santiago the King dissolves the Cortes Federales on the recommendation of the Federal Assembly, and the decree of dissolution states the time, methods, and preparations for the election that follows. The 13th Cortes Federales opened on 12.I.1755 AN following an election held from 15-17.IX.1754 AN, and the 1759 AN election falls at the expiry of that mandate. Under the Cortes Federales Act, 1694 the new Cortes must be summoned within two weeks of the full certification of the results.

Seat apportionment

The Cortes Federales Act, 1694 sets a floor of 619 deputies, requires that the size of the Assembly be revised to reflect the population of the Federation, and provides that each Region receive a minimum initial representation with the remainder distributed in proportion to population. The Assembly had stood at 749 seats since 1744 AN, when it was enlarged from 689.

The 1758 New Alexandrian census, the first to enumerate Oportia after its accession, recorded a federal population of 514,819,749 and provided the basis for re-apportionment. Seats are distributed among the Regions by the Droop quota with largest remainders, each Region first receiving a minimum initial representation. On the 1758 AN count the Assembly is enlarged to 801 seats for the 1759 AN election, its first expansion since 1744 AN, of which 401 form an absolute majority. Oportia enters with 39 seats, and the twelve Regions that elected the 13th Cortes Federales are revised upward from their 1753 AN apportionment, none of them losing seats.

Seat apportionment for the 1759 AN general election
Region Population (1758 AN) Seats in 1754 AN Seats in 1759 AN Change
Alduria Alduria 101,237,495 156 158 ▲ +2
Wechua Wechua Nation 96,164,385 148 150 ▲ +2
Santander Santander 69,771,936 107 109 ▲ +2
South Lyrica South Lyrica 55,454,882 84 86 ▲ +2
North Lyrica North Lyrica 42,608,197 65 66 ▲ +1
Isles of Caputia Isles of Caputia 38,911,298 59 60 ▲ +1
Oportia Oportia 25,434,584 None 39 New
Boriquén Boriquén 24,345,837 37 38 ▲ +1
Valencia Valencia 22,375,759 34 35 ▲ +1
New Caputia New Caputia 20,432,920 31 32 ▲ +1
Islas de la Libertad Islas de la Libertad 8,954,019 14 14 Steady 0
New Luthoria New Luthoria 7,675,846 12 12 Steady 0
Federal Capital District Cárdenas 1,452,591 2 2 Steady 0
Total 514,819,749 749 801 ▲ +52

Voting eligibility and registration

All citizens of the Federation aged 18 or older on election day are eligible to vote. Registration is automatic on turning 18, and same-day registration is permitted at polling places on production of identification. The Federal Elections Commission recorded an electorate of 327,518,478 at the term-limits referendum of 1758 AN, a total that included Oportia's 16,176,000 electors.[1]

Voting process

Voters receive two ballots, a party-list ballot and a separate ballot for independent candidates. Polling runs over three days. Regional governments are required to provide enough polling places that no voter travels more than ten kilometers to cast a ballot, with mobile stations serving remote communities. The Federal Elections Commission sets uniform equipment and procedure across the Regions, while local boards retain discretion over polling-place selection and staffing.

Vote counting and certification

Counting begins at the polling stations when the polls close, under the observation of party representatives and independent observers, and is tabulated at Regional level, where the Sainte-Laguë formula is applied to the parties that have cleared the 2 percent threshold. Each Region's chief electoral officer certifies its result to the Federal Elections Commission, which conducts a final review before the official outcome is announced.

Government formation

A party returning an absolute majority of seats may expect its leader to be invited by the King to form a government. Where no party holds a majority, a government may be formed by coalition or as a minority administration supported by a confidence agreement, as in 1755 AN. Under Article 30 of the Proclamation of Punta Santiago the King appoints as President of the Government a citizen who commands a majority of the Federal Assembly, and where no candidate commands one, the candidate with the most votes on a second ballot. The rejection of the 1758 AN term-limits amendment left those rules unchanged.

Contesting parties

Five parties that sat in the 13th Cortes Federales contest the election, joined by the Republican Party of Oportia on the Oportian list and by independent candidates, whose 1754 AN showing was the largest non-aligned result in the Federation's electoral history. Seats below are those held at the close of the Cortes.

Parties contesting the 1759 AN general election
Party Leader Alliance Seats at dissolution 1754 AN result
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) José Manuel Montero None 372 372, 48.88%
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) Marcos Ferreira Gonçalves AJNA 196 196, 26.05%
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) Francisco Gabaza None 119 119, 15.64%
Wakara People's Party (WPP) Yuiza Bohi'o AJNA 20 23, 3.34%
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) Elena Svensson None 10 10, 1.82%
Republican Party of Oportia (RPO) Sofia Laurent None None Did not contest
Independent & Unaligned Various None 32 29, 4.28%

Federal Humanist Party

The Federal Humanist Party has governed continuously since the 1739 general election and is led into the election by Premier José Manuel Montero, who has held the party leadership since 1749 AN and sits for the Wechua Nation. It directed its regional sector parties to oppose the 1758 AN term-limits amendment and carried the argument by 64 to 36, most heavily in its own strongholds. Its organization in Oportia is newly acquired: the Nationalist and Humanist Party, which led the campaign against accession in 1755 AN, merged into the FHP in XIII.1758 AN.[2] The party enters the election defending a Vice-President it has not disciplined over the Vanguard parades and a record made in two years of recession.

Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie

The Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie contests the election as the Official Opposition, a coalition of the Democratic Socialist Party and the Wakara People's Party holding 216 seats. Marcos Ferreira Gonçalves has led the DSP since the convention of XV.1753 AN and chairs the alliance; he sits for Santander and was the first Santanderian to lead a major New Alexandrian party. He survived a leadership challenge in the weeks after the 1754 AN election, the episode known as La Carta Muerta, which collected nine of the 196 signatures required and collapsed overnight.

The WPP has been led since 5.III.1755 AN by Yuiza Bohi'o, the Boriquén deputy who defeated acting chair Mayani Guacanagari to become the first woman to lead the party outright, succeeding Gueyacán Vázquez, who had led it for a decade. The party lost three deputies to the crossbench four days before the 13th Cortes opened and sits at twenty seats. It campaigned for a Yes at the term-limits referendum, casting the cap as a guard against the concentration of power, and Boriquén returned the highest Yes share in the Federation at 66.6 percent.[1] The alliance gains the Democratic Restoration Coalition's social-democratic majority and the New Left of Oportia in the Oportian realignment.

Federal Consensus Party

The Federal Consensus Party under Francisco Gabaza, leader since IX.1751 AN and sitting for Santander, adopted a posture of constructive opposition in the 13th Cortes and abstained on the confidence vote of 1755 AN. Gabaza has opposed the successive draws on the federal reserves through the recession and directed his criticism of the Vanguard parades at the Gendarmerie's weeks of light-touch policing rather than only at the marchers.[4] The party has lost ground in every quarterly poll of 1758 AN, its support slipping from 15 to 11 percent over the year. It gains Regional Governor Clementina Duffy Carr's centrist wing of the Democratic Restoration Coalition in Oportia.

Civic Governance Alliance

The Civic Governance Alliance registered as a party in XII.1753 AN and won ten seats at its first general election. Elena Svensson lost her own seat in North Lyrica, however, and has led from outside the chamber since, with Tomás Iñiguez leading the parliamentary group. The party moved to the opposition benches in X.1754 AN, when Montero walked away from the coalition deal that would have delivered the Clean Government Act, and it campaigned for a Yes at the term-limits referendum on good-government grounds. Its declared ground for 1759 AN is the one the Assembly refused twice: after the defeat of its party-finance amendments on 17.IX.1756 AN, Svensson said the CGA would bring the money in politics back and make it the question of the election.[6] Svensson has topped the Institute's leader-favorability ratings throughout the term, standing at a net plus 29 in IX.1758 AN, while the party itself has eased to 5 percent. The Civic Reform Alliance's alignment gives the CGA its first organized presence in Oportia.[2]

Independents and the Aldurian Independent Coalition

Independent candidates returned 29 seats in 1754 AN, 25 of them from the Aldurian regional list, the largest non-aligned bloc in the Federation's electoral history and a product of the collapse of the Aldurian DSP organization after the death of Leila Bensouda. Twelve of those deputies formed the Aldurian Independent Coalition under Coordinator Émile Bouchard and have sustained the government on confidence and supply since 1755 AN. The remainder sit as crossbenchers, among them Piti Gándara, who campaigned for a Yes at the term-limits referendum while the Coalition withheld support over retroactivity.[8] The Coalition is a registered parliamentary caucus rather than a political party, unwhipped and without a policy program or any standing outside the chamber, and its members were elected in their individual capacities. Polling organizations began reporting its support separately at the end of 1755 AN, at roughly 4 to 5 percent nationally and concentrated in Alduria.

Republican Party of Oportia

Alone among Oportia's parties, the Republican Party of Oportia chose to stand on its own Oportian list rather than merge into a national party. Its leader Sofia Laurent has recast it as the Region's autonomist voice, calling for autonomy now and naming independence as a longer aim. The party points to the interior's cultural ties with neighboring Constancia. The Region's interior and eastern departments voted against accession in 1755 AN while its five coastal departments carried the Yes.[2]

Outgoing Federal Assembly

Main article: 13th Cortes Federales

The 13th Cortes Federales was elected in 1754 AN and opened on 12.I.1755 AN. The government has held office throughout on the votes of 372 Federal Humanist deputies and the twelve independents of the Aldurian Independent Coalition, a working majority of nine on confidence and budget matters and nothing beyond them.

Composition of the Federal Assembly at the close of the 13th Cortes Federales
Party Leader Seats Status
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) José Manuel Montero 372 Government
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) Marcos Ferreira Gonçalves 196 Opposition
(AJNA)
Wakara People's Party (WPP) Yuiza Bohi'o 20
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) Francisco Gabaza 119 Constructive opposition
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) Elena Svensson 10 Opposition
Independent & Unaligned Various 32 12 in confidence & supply; 20 crossbench
Total 749

As a Region admitted only after the 1754 AN election, Oportia held no seats in this Assembly. Gary Wilson-Clarke, who had sat in the Cortes since 1703 AN, retired at the dissolution of the 12th Cortes Federales and did not sit in the 13th. The Speaker, Carolina Mendez of Alduria, acknowledged the retirement at the opening session.

Business left unfinished

The Cortes approaches its end with much of its late business unfinished, though the operation on the southern coast was funded. The supplementary appropriation and settlement authorization for Operation Salt Meridian, laid by Montero on 2.VIII.1758 AN, were carried on 9.X.1758 AN on the votes of the Federal Humanist Party and the Aldurian Independent Coalition with a number of crossbench independents, over AJNA opposition on the cost of the operation and on the property of those who left the occupied coast. The government's National Resilience Fund Establishment Act, 1758 is before the Federal Assembly for division, the opposition's rival bill having failed to reach the floor. The Ioanna-Nouvelle Alexandrie Treaty Ratification Act, 1758 and the Bassaridia Vaeringheim Treaty Ratification Act, 1758, both given a first reading on 4.XI.1758 AN and referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, await division. And the review of the statutory basis for binding referendums that Fred Strong demanded after the term-limits vote has not been taken up. The government's Soil Stewardship and Food Abundance Act, 1759 passed the Federal Assembly on 20.VII.1759 AN and received the Royal Assent on 20.VIII.1759 AN. Any of these that the 13th Cortes does not dispose of passes to the 14th.

Opinion polling

National voting intention has been reported quarterly through the term by the Institute of Public Opinion in partnership with NBC News, which polls registered voters and reports the AJNA parties as a single figure. The series shows a governing party that held a lead of fifteen points or more for three years and lost most of it in one quarter. The 1757 Alexandrium market crash of 5.XII.1757 AN cost the Federal Humanist Party eight points in a single poll, the steepest fall the series has recorded, and the party has not been above 42 percent since. The lead narrowed to seven points in III.1758 AN, five in VI, and three in IX, and in 1759 AN it held at three in III and widened to four in VI as both parties fell and neither gained.

The movement since has come from the Federal Consensus Party rather than from the government. The FCP has fallen in each poll of 1758 AN, from 15 percent to 11, with its losses dividing between AJNA and independent candidates; the Institute has read AJNA's rise as a verdict on the cost of living and the Consensus Party's drift rather than as an endorsement of the term-limits amendment its leader was carrying. Government net approval has been below the line in every poll since XII.1757 AN, reaching its best figure of 1758 AN at minus 2 in IX on the strength of the Ioanna friendship treaty and the unopposed opening of Operation Salt Meridian, in which no shot was fired although four aircrew were lost to weather on the night of the landing. The Institute noted that the quarter's gain came from abroad while the recession at home, first or second in every poll of the series, had not moved, and that the country backed the landing but divided on its cost, with the operation's appropriation still unvoted. The two polls of 1759 AN found the vote scattering rather than consolidating as the election neared. Both the Federal Humanist Party and AJNA slipped in III, to 41 and 38, the vote they shed passing to the smaller parties and to independents rather than across the divide; Elena Svensson's Civic Governance Alliance rose to 6 percent and then 7 on the party-finance argument, and the Republican Party of Oportia entered the series at 1 percent and then 2, the first Oportian party to appear in it since the Region's realignment. The government's net approval, below the line in every poll since XII.1757 AN, recovered to its best reading of the recession at minus 1 in VI on the passage of the recovery package, a lift the Institute found in the approval and direction numbers but not in the vote, where the Federal Humanist Party held at 41. The sharpest single movement was Francisco Gabaza's, whose favorability fell to a net plus 2 after he did not speak in the recovery debate even as his party's support held, and the readings sharpened the questions about his hold on the Federal Consensus Party as the campaign approached. A special campaign-launch poll conducted 7-9.VIII found the race tightened to a single point, the Federal Humanist Party at 39 and AJNA at 38, government approval level for the first time since the crash, and the cost of living topping a first full issue table on which party finance had slipped to fifth.

IOP/NBC News national party voting intention, 1756 AN-1759 AN
"If the election were held today, which party would you support?" Percentages of registered voters. Margin of error ±2.2%. From III.1759 AN the independent and other figure includes the Republican Party of Oportia, contesting its first federal election (1.0 in III, 2.0 in VI).
Survey Fieldwork FHP AJNA FCP CGA Ind. Lead
1754 general election 15-17.IX.1754 AN 48.9 29.4 15.6 1.8 4.3 19.5
II.1756 AN 8-13.II 49 30 16 4 1 19
VI.1756 AN 4-9.VI 49 30 15 5 1 19
XII.1756 AN 4-9.XII 48 31 14 6 1 17
XV.1756 AN 8-13.XV 47 32 14 6 1 15
III.1757 AN 16-21.III 48 31 14 6 1 17
VI.1757 AN 16-21.VI 51 29 13 6 1 22
IX.1757 AN 16-21.IX 48 31 14 6 1 17
XII.1757 AN 18-20.XII 40 36 15 7 2 4
III.1758 AN 19-21.III 42 35 15 7 1 7
VI.1758 AN 19-21.VI 42 37 13 6 2 5
IX.1758 AN 19-21.IX 42 39 11 5 3 3
III.1759 AN 19-21.III 41 38 10 6 5 3
VI.1759 AN 19-21.VI 41 37 10 7 5 4
VIII.1759 AN 7-9.VIII 39 38 10 8 5 1

Party leader favorability

The Institute's leader ratings have run against the party numbers throughout the term. At IX.1758 AN Elena Svensson was the most favorably rated leader in the Federation at a net plus 29, ahead of Yuiza Bohi'o at plus 23, Marcos Ferreira Gonçalves at plus 20, Émile Bouchard at plus 10, and Francisco Gabaza at plus 8. Premier José Manuel Montero was the only leader underwater, at minus 2, his best figure of the year.

IOP/NBC News party leader favorability, 19-21.IX.1758 AN
Percentages of registered voters; margin of error ±2.2%.
Leader Favorable Unfavorable No opinion Net
José Manuel Montero (FHP) 45 47 8 ▼ -2
Marcos Ferreira Gonçalves (DSP) 49 29 22 ▲ +20
Elena Svensson (CGA) 53 24 23 ▲ +29
Francisco Gabaza (FCP) 40 32 28 ▲ +8
Yuiza Bohi'o (WPP) 36 13 51 ▲ +23
Émile Bouchard (AIC) 31 21 48 ▲ +10

Campaign

The formal campaign had not opened at the close of 1758 AN. When term limits led the Institute of Public Opinion's issue table in its survey of 19-21.IX.1758 AN, it was the first time a constitutional question had topped the series; the referendum that put it there has since been decided, and by the polls of 1759 AN the cost of living had returned to the front, with party finance and the civil-liberties argument reopened by the Vanguard parades rising behind it. The arguments left standing are the economic record of a government entering a third year of recession, the civil-liberties case reopened by the Vanguard parades and the court order that ended them, and the terms on which Oportia enters the federal party system.

In Parap on 22.VII.1759 AN, independent Deputy Piti Gándara pressed the civil-liberties argument to the front of the campaign, asking every party whether it would pass her Public Order bill in the next Cortes.[9]

Federal Humanist Party campaign

The governing party is contesting the election on the record of its recovery program and on the Soil Stewardship and Food Abundance Act as its answer on the cost of living, seeking a third consecutive term for José Manuel Montero.[10]

"We have reminded them that we are not a milquetoast party. We do not wear neckties and lanyards. Nor do we mumble conventional pieties about kindness and try to pass those off as the foundations of public policy. Now, in the year ahead, it is our duty to remind the regions of this vast Federation that our cadres constitute the natural, indeed the inevitable, and enduring party of government. Go forth!"
—Fred Strong, closing remarks to an FHP stadium rally in Punta Santiago, XIV.1758 AN

Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie campaign

The Alliance is contesting the election as a single operation on the People's Deal, its shared platform, with the cost of living and the revival of the tabled Housing Justice Act as its central arguments.[10]

Its two member parties run component campaigns:

Federal Consensus Party campaign

The Federal Consensus Party is campaigning on fiscal restraint, arguing that the borrowing behind the recovery has put the debt on a path toward the ceiling written into the Act itself.[10]

Civic Governance Alliance campaign

The Civic Governance Alliance is campaigning on party finance and clean government, the cause it has carried since the defeat of its Clean Government and Political Reform Act, 1754 in 1755 AN.[10]

Regional and independent candidates

The Republican Party of Oportia is the only Oportian party standing on its own regional list rather than through a national party, and is campaigning on the terms of the Region's place in the Federation.[10]

The Aldurian Independent Coalition under Émile Bouchard, whose deputies sustain the government under the confidence-and-supply agreement, is contesting the election as independents rather than as a party and has pressed the government through the campaign on the uneven regional reach of the recovery.[10]

Campaign finance

Campaign finance re-entered the election through the Civic Governance Alliance, which made the transparency of political money the center of its platform and revived its long-stalled call for statutory disclosure rules and an independent Federal Anti-Corruption Commission.[11]

Federal results

The Federal Elections Commission certified the result on 19.IX.1759 AN. The Federal Humanist Party finished first with 293 of the 801 seats, 108 short of a majority; the figures below give the national totals and the result in each of the thirteen Regions, on a turnout of 87.9 percent.

National

Color Political Party Leader Votes % of votes Change Elected % of seats Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) José Manuel Montero 119,711,462 36.5% ▼ -12.3% 293 36.6% ▼ -79
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) Marcos Ferreira Gonçalves 94,903,277 29.0% ▲ +2.9% 232 29.0% ▲ +36
Wakara People's Party (WPP) Yuiza Bohi'o 12,372,618 3.8% ▲ +0.4% 28 3.5% ▲ +5
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie combined total: 107,275,895 32.8% ▲ +3.4% 260 32.5% ▲ +41
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) Elena Svensson 38,283,831 11.7% ▲ +9.9% 95 11.9% ▲ +85
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) Francisco Gabaza 38,076,196 11.6% ▼ -4.0% 93 11.6% ▼ -26
Independent & Unaligned No leader 20,012,290 6.1% ▲ +1.8% 50 6.2% ▲ +21
Republican Party of Oportia (RPO) Sofia Laurent 4,191,938 1.3% New 10 1.2% New
Total 327,551,612 100.0% 801 100.0%
Turnout: 87.9% (▲ +34.9%)

The Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie figures fold the Democratic Socialist Party and the Wakara People's Party together, as at the previous election; the Wakara People's Party contested only Boriquén, where it carried the whole of the alliance's vote.

Regional

Federal Capital District

Election results in the Region of Federal Capital District
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 308,226 34.0% ▲ +0.1% 1 Steady 0
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 217,572 24.0% ▲ +24.0% 1 ▲ +1
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 190,375 21.0% ▼ -20.3% 0 ▼ -1
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 154,113 17.0% ▼ -7.1% 0 Steady 0
Independent/Unaligned 36,262 4.0% ▲ +3.4% 0 Steady 0
Totals: 906,548 votes, 2 deputies

New Luthoria

Election results in the Region of New Luthoria
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 2,665,092 50.0% ▼ -2.2% 6 ▼ -1
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 1,705,659 32.0% ▼ -2.7% 4 Steady 0
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 479,717 9.0% ▼ -1.2% 1 Steady 0
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 373,113 7.0% ▲ +4.4% 1 ▲ +1
Independent/Unaligned 106,604 2.0% ▲ +1.7% 0 Steady 0
Totals: 5,330,184 votes, 12 deputies

Islas de la Libertad

Election results in the Region of Islas de la Libertad
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 2,401,630 38.0% ▼ -5.4% 5 ▼ -2
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 2,148,827 34.0% ▼ -2.0% 5 Steady 0
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 948,012 15.0% ▼ -0.6% 2 Steady 0
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 505,606 8.0% ▲ +5.7% 1 ▲ +1
Independent/Unaligned 316,004 5.0% ▲ +2.2% 1 ▲ +1
Totals: 6,320,078 votes, 14 deputies

New Caputia

Election results in the Region of New Caputia
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 8,182,820 68.0% ▼ -3.0% 22 ▼ -1
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 1,564,363 13.0% ▼ -3.0% 4 ▼ -1
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 1,083,020 9.0% ▲ +0.8% 3 ▲ +1
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 842,349 7.0% ▲ +3.4% 2 ▲ +1
Independent/Unaligned 361,007 3.0% ▲ +1.8% 1 ▲ +1
Totals: 12,033,559 votes, 32 deputies

Valencia

Election results in the Region of Valencia
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 9,322,771 60.0% ▼ -0.4% 21 Steady 0
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 3,573,729 23.0% ▼ -2.0% 8 ▼ -1
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 1,243,036 8.0% ▼ -5.0% 3 ▼ -1
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 1,087,657 7.0% ▲ +7.0% 2 ▲ +2
Independent/Unaligned 310,759 2.0% ▲ +0.3% 1 ▲ +1
Totals: 15,537,951 votes, 35 deputies

Boriquén

Election results in the Region of Boriquén
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Wakara People's Party (WPP/AJNA) 12,372,618 72.0% ▲ +9.0% 28 ▲ +4
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 3,780,522 22.0% ▼ -3.9% 8 ▼ -1
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 515,526 3.0% ▲ +0.5% 1 Steady 0
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 343,684 2.0% ▼ -6.5% 1 ▼ -2
Independent/Unaligned 171,842 1.0% ▲ +0.8% 0 Steady 0
Totals: 17,184,192 votes, 38 deputies

Oportia

Election results in the Region of Oportia
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 5,365,680 32.0% New 13 New
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 4,862,648 29.0% New 11 New
Republican Party of Oportia (RPO) 4,191,938 25.0% New 10 New
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 1,341,420 8.0% New 3 New
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 838,388 5.0% New 2 New
Independent/Unaligned 167,678 1.0% New 0 New
Totals: 16,767,750 votes, 39 deputies

Isles of Caputia

Election results in the Region of Isles of Caputia
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 16,540,586 62.0% ▼ -15.3% 37 ▼ -9
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 4,802,106 18.0% ▲ +8.3% 11 ▲ +5
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 2,134,269 8.0% ▲ +5.5% 5 ▲ +4
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 1,867,485 7.0% ▼ -0.4% 4 Steady 0
Independent/Unaligned 1,333,918 5.0% ▲ +1.9% 3 ▲ +1
Totals: 26,678,364 votes, 60 deputies

North Lyrica

Election results in the Region of North Lyrica
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 15,505,379 60.0% ▼ -17.1% 40 ▼ -11
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 6,460,574 25.0% ▲ +23.5% 17 ▲ +17
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 2,842,653 11.0% ▼ -3.8% 7 ▼ -3
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 516,846 2.0% ▼ -1.4% 1 ▼ -1
Independent/Unaligned 516,846 2.0% ▼ -1.3% 1 ▼ -1
Totals: 25,842,298 votes, 66 deputies

South Lyrica

Election results in the Region of South Lyrica
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 18,279,316 50.0% ▼ -5.2% 43 ▼ -4
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 9,870,830 27.0% ▼ -9.0% 23 ▼ -8
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 4,387,036 12.0% ▲ +10.4% 10 ▲ +10
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 2,924,690 8.0% ▲ +1.6% 7 ▲ +1
Independent/Unaligned 1,096,759 3.0% ▲ +2.2% 3 ▲ +3
Totals: 36,558,631 votes, 86 deputies

Santander

Election results in the Region of Santander
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 15,884,349 37.0% ▼ -24.7% 40 ▼ -26
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 12,879,202 30.0% ▲ +10.2% 33 ▲ +12
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 6,868,908 16.0% ▼ -2.4% 17 ▼ -3
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 4,722,374 11.0% ▲ +11.0% 12 ▲ +12
Independent/Unaligned 2,575,840 6.0% ▲ +5.9% 7 ▲ +7
Totals: 42,930,672 votes, 109 deputies

Wechua Nation

Election results in the Region of Wechua Nation
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 21,892,880 37.0% ▼ -6.1% 56 ▼ -8
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 18,342,684 31.0% ▼ -10.9% 46 ▼ -17
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 9,467,192 16.0% ▲ +14.0% 24 ▲ +21
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 8,283,793 14.0% ▲ +2.0% 21 ▲ +3
Independent/Unaligned 1,183,399 2.0% ▲ +1.0% 3 ▲ +3
Totals: 59,169,947 votes, 150 deputies

Alduria

Election results in the Region of Alduria
Party Votes % of votes Change Deputies Gain/Loss
Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) 18,064,515 29.0% ▲ +19.1% 46 ▲ +31
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 15,572,858 25.0% ▼ -15.2% 39 ▼ -24
Independent/Unaligned 11,835,372 19.0% ▲ +2.9% 30 ▲ +5
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 10,589,543 17.0% ▼ -14.2% 27 ▼ -22
Civic Governance Alliance (CGA) 6,229,143 10.0% ▲ +7.3% 16 ▲ +12
Totals: 62,291,431 votes, 158 deputies

Regional elections

Analysis

The election returned the Federal Humanist Party as the largest party for the ninth consecutive time, but cut deeply into the position it had held since 1739 AN. The party fell from 372 seats to 293 and from 48.9 to 36.5 percent of the vote, the steepest decline it has recorded, and finished 108 short of the 401 seats required for a majority. Because the Federal Assembly had grown from 749 to 801 seats, the loss ran deeper in votes than in the seat figure alone: the party shed more than a quarter of its 1754 AN support. The Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie advanced on both measures, to 260 seats and 32.8 percent, and carried seven Regions to the government's five, with the Federal Consensus Party holding Islas de la Libertad. The Alliance's lead in Regions did not translate into a lead in seats, which rested on the scale of the Humanist majorities in Santander, the Isles of Caputia, and North Lyrica rather than on the number of Regions each side won. The result also completed a pattern the term's closing polls had traced: the recovery package the government carried in V.1759 AN had brought its approval back to level by the eve of the vote without bringing back its vote, the ground it regained on the economy passing to the smaller parties and to independents rather than to the governing party.

The night's largest single movement was the Civic Governance Alliance's. The party that had won ten seats in 1754 AN returned 95, its vote rising from 1.8 to 11.7 percent as the party-finance argument it had carried through the term reached the country, and it passed the Federal Consensus Party to become the third party of the Federation. The gain was widest where the party had built its base and its leader had campaigned, taking 25 percent in North Lyrica and 16 in the Wechua Nation from a standing start; there Elena Svensson regained the seat she had lost in 1754 AN, returning to the chamber she had led the party from outside through the whole of the 13th Cortes. The Consensus Party fell from 119 seats to 93, extending the decline the quarterly polls had traced across 1758 AN, and independents rose to 50 seats, thirty of them again from the Aldurian list. The Republican Party of Oportia entered the chamber with ten seats at Oportia's first federal election, the only party to win seats on a single Region's list.

The government's strongholds held their rank without holding their margins. The Federal Humanist Party remained first in Santander while falling from 62 to 37 percent, first in the Isles of Caputia while falling from 77 to 62, and first in North Lyrica while falling from 77 to 60 as the Civic Governance Alliance took second place there. The pattern of a first-placed party losing ground in its own territory, rather than being overtaken in it, is what left the Federal Humanist Party ahead on seats and short of a majority at the same time.

Aftermath

Government formation

No party held the 401 seats required to command the Federal Assembly, and the election returned a hung 14th Cortes Federales. With the Federal Humanist Party first on 293 seats, King Sinchi Roca II invited Premier José Manuel Montero to attempt to form a government, appointing him Formateur on 21.IX.1759 AN and asking him to report to the Crown on the prospects of a government able to command the chamber.[5] The arithmetic left the fifty independents pivotal to every majority. A Humanist government could reach 401 in two ways: with the Civic Governance Alliance and the independents, at 438, or with the Federal Consensus Party and the independents, at 436. An Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie government had two routes of its own, with the Civic Governance Alliance and the independents, at 405, or with the Consensus Party and the independents, at 403. The three opposition parties together held 448.

On 22.IX.1759 AN the Civic Governance Alliance's Elena Svensson ruled out entering or supporting a Humanist-led government, citing the government's record on the party-finance and clean-government measures the Assembly had defeated twice during the 13th Cortes. The decision closed the larger of Montero's two routes to a majority and left a Humanist government reliant on the Consensus Party and the independents, while placing the Civic Governance Alliance's 95 seats within reach of an Alliance-led bid.[12] No government had been formed on the certification of the result.

Montero reported that he could not form a government, and the King commissioned Gonçalves as formateur; the Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie, the Civic Governance Alliance and the Federal Consensus Party subsequently concluded the Federal Accord coalition agreement, 1759, signed on 23.XIII.1759 AN, providing for an Alliance-led government of 448 seats.

Domestic reactions

The result turned attention to the fifty independents and to the Aldurian Independent Coalition under Émile Bouchard, whose twelve votes had sustained the outgoing government on confidence and supply and were again necessary to any Humanist majority. The Federal Consensus Party, reduced to 93 seats, became the only remaining partner through which Premier José Manuel Montero could reach 401 after the Civic Governance Alliance ruled his party out, while the Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie presented itself as the alternative core of a government able to command the new chamber.

International reactions

See also

References