Talk:Foreign relations of Alduria
From MicrasWiki
Sandbox
| Country | Formal relations | Informal relations | Visa free travel | History |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | No contact between Alperkin and Alduria. | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | No contact between Alrig and Alduria. Alduria has a general positive view, due to Alrig's association with trade partner, Jingdao. | |
| ✖ | ✓ | ✖ | Anatakia's initial settlement near Alduria in Eura provoked the ire of Alduria as the new settlements would conflict directly with Aldurian regional designs, determining that the new country was a threat to Alduria's stability and independence. Revised plans indicate Anatakia is likely to resettle into central Eura. However, until relations can be opened and a clearer picture of Anatakian intentions established, Alduria sees Anatakia as a regional threat. | |
| ✖ | ✓ | ✖ | Arcadia and Alduria are engaged in informal diplomatic conversations. Member of the Batavian Confederation. | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✖ | Batavia and Alduria have exchanged ambassadors. They are currently negotiating a Treaty of Amity and Commerce (1673). Key Aldurian trade partner. Member of the Batavian Confederation. | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | No contact between Beneluccas and Alduria. Alduria has a general positive view, due to Benelucca's membership in the Batavian Confederation. | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | No contact between Birgeshir and Alduria. | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Constancia and Alduria are close trade and regional (Eura) partners. (Treaty Alduria-Constancia, 1672) | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Craitland and Alduria are close trade partners. (Treaty Alduria-Craitland, 1672) | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | The Çeridgul and Alduria are close trade and regional (Eura) partners. (Treaty Alduria-Çeridgul, 1672; Joint Memorandum on Çer Irregulars in the Euran Green, 1672.) | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✓ | Eklesia and Alduria do not maintain formal or informal relations. However, Alduria has a positive view of Eklesia, and it unilaterally extends its merchants, students, and tourists visa-free passage with valid Eklesian papers. | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✖ | Elwynn and Alduria maintain friendly relations. Both nations are currently negotiating a Treaty of Friendship (1673). Alduria maintains a positive view of Elwynn, dramatically improved by the attendance of the Elwynnese Prince to the inauguration of President Campos in 1672. | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✖ | Formal relations established with the Treaty of Port Farrar, close economic cooperation through the Iron Company. | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | No diplomatic relations exist, the Liberadosan government works together with Hoenn in the HMFC, and is an ally against the attempted USSO blockade of Hoenn. | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | USSO member | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | Regarded as a USSO puppet state | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | Los Liberados considers Jingdao an oppressive government, based on Jingdao's historical occupation of the Norfolk Isles. | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✓ | ✖ | Informal relations have been established, mainly based on mutual agreements on international trade. | |
| ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Member of the Batavian Confederation | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✓ | ✖ | Informal trade relations through the Iron Company's presence on the demesne of Alrodey. | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✓ | ✖ | Informal trade relations through the Iron Company's presence in Palesmenia. | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✓ | ✓ | ✖ | Formal relations through the Batavian Confederation, extensive trade relations through the Iron Company. | |
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | ||
| ✖ | ✖ | ✖ | USSO member |