Talk:Foreign relations of Alduria: Difference between revisions
From MicrasWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
|bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | |bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | ||
|bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | |bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | ||
|Constancia and Alduria are close trade and regional (Eura) partners. | |Constancia and Alduria are close trade and regional (Eura) partners.<br><small> | ||
*[https://www.alduria.cc/showthread.php?tid=102 Treaty Alduria-Constancia], 1672.</small> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|{{team flag|Craitland}} | |{{team flag|Craitland}} | ||
Line 62: | Line 63: | ||
|bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | |bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | ||
|bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | |bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | ||
|Craitland and Alduria are close trade partners. | |Craitland and Alduria are close trade partners.<br><small> | ||
*[https://www.alduria.cc/showthread.php?tid=108 Treaty Alduria-Craitland], 1672.</small> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|{{team flag|Çeridgul}} | |{{team flag|Çeridgul}} | ||
Line 68: | Line 70: | ||
|bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | |bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | ||
|bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | |bgcolor=#BBFFBB align="center"|'''✓''' | ||
|The Çeridgul and Alduria are close trade and regional (Eura) partners. | |The Çeridgul and Alduria are close trade and regional (Eura) partners.<br><small> | ||
* [https://www.alduria.cc/showthread.php?tid=117 Treaty Alduria-Çeridgul], 1672; | |||
* [https://www.alduria.cc/showthread.php?tid=117&pid=374#pid374 Joint Memorandum on Çer Irregulars in the Euran Green], 1672.</small> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|{{team flag|Eklesia}} | |{{team flag|Eklesia}} |
Revision as of 02:06, 13 June 2019
Sandbox
Country | Formal relations | Informal relations | Visa free travel | History |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | No contact between Alperkin and Alduria. |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | No contact between Alrig and Alduria. Alduria has a general positive view, due to Alrig's association with trade partner, Jingdao. |
![]() |
✖ | ✓ | ✖ | Anatakia's initial settlement near Alduria in Eura provoked the ire of Alduria as the new settlements would conflict directly with Aldurian regional designs, determining that the new country was a threat to Alduria's stability and independence. Revised plans indicate Anatakia is likely to resettle into central Eura. However, until relations can be opened and a clearer picture of Anatakian intentions established, Alduria sees Anatakia as a regional threat. |
![]() |
✖ | ✓ | ✖ | Arcadia and Alduria are engaged in informal diplomatic conversations. Member of the Batavian Confederation. |
![]() |
✓ | ✓ | ✖ | Batavia and Alduria have exchanged ambassadors. They are currently negotiating a Treaty of Amity and Commerce (1673). Key Aldurian trade partner. Member of the Batavian Confederation. |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | No contact between Beneluccas and Alduria. Alduria has a general positive view, due to Benelucca's membership in the Batavian Confederation. |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | No contact between Birgeshir and Alduria. |
![]() |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Constancia and Alduria are close trade and regional (Eura) partners.
|
![]() |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Craitland and Alduria are close trade partners.
|
![]() |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | The Çeridgul and Alduria are close trade and regional (Eura) partners. |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✓ | Eklesia and Alduria do not maintain formal or informal relations. However, Alduria has a positive view of Eklesia, and it unilaterally extends its merchants, students, and tourists visa-free passage with valid Eklesian papers. |
![]() |
✓ | ✓ | ✖ | Elwynn and Alduria maintain friendly relations. Both nations are currently negotiating a Treaty of Friendship (1673). Alduria maintains a positive view of Elwynn, dramatically improved by the attendance of the Elwynnese Prince to the inauguration of President Campos in 1672. |
![]() |
✓ | ✓ | ✖ | Formal relations established with the Treaty of Port Farrar, close economic cooperation through the Iron Company. |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | No diplomatic relations exist, the Liberadosan government works together with Hoenn in the HMFC, and is an ally against the attempted USSO blockade of Hoenn. |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | USSO member |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | Regarded as a USSO puppet state |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | Los Liberados considers Jingdao an oppressive government, based on Jingdao's historical occupation of the Norfolk Isles. |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✓ | ✖ | Informal relations have been established, mainly based on mutual agreements on international trade. |
![]() |
✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Member of the Batavian Confederation |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✓ | ✖ | Informal trade relations through the Iron Company's presence on the demesne of Alrodey. |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✓ | ✖ | Informal trade relations through the Iron Company's presence in Palesmenia. |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✓ | ✓ | ✖ | Formal relations through the Batavian Confederation, extensive trade relations through the Iron Company. |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | |
![]() |
✖ | ✖ | ✖ | USSO member |