Federal Humanist Party

Federal Humanist Party Partido Humanista Federal
Abbreviation	FHP
Co-Archon	Daniela Obregon y Zarzuela
Co-Archon	Juan Pablo Jimenez
Presidential candidate	José Manuel Montero
Founded	21.XV.1692 AN
Preceded by	Coalition for Federal Progress (in part) Nationalist and Humanist Club of the Wechua Nation
Newspaper	Le Nouveau Siècle
Student wing	N&H Vanguard Group
Youth wing	Young Humanists League
Membership  (1694 AN)	2,049,121
Ideology	Federalism Humanism Corporatism Constitutionalism Pro-Raspur Pact
Political position	Centre-right
International affiliation	Nationalist & Humanist Party
Official colours	Black      Gold      Purple
Federal Assembly of Nouvelle Alexandrie	324 / 689

The Federal Humanist Party a centre-right and right-wing Humanist party operating in the Federation of Nouvelle Alexandrie. Established in Parap on 21.XV.1692 AN as a merger of the Nationalist and Humanist Club of the Wechua Nation and various pro-government and federalist cadres in Alduria and Lyrica. Co-chairmen are Gerhardt Eugen Seydlitz and Felipe de Almagro, who replaced Augustus Strong in 1704 AN following the party's defeat in the general election of 1703.

In 1694 AN the FHP reported that it had received membership dues from 2,049,121 citizens of Nouvelle Alexandrie, including 431,666 enrolments in the youth and student branches of the Humanist Vanguard. In the elections of 1693 AN the party had received 47.7% of the total number of votes cast, making it the largest single party albeit one that fell short of being able to secure a majority to govern on its own.

History

Almagro as Leader

After leading a successful presidency until 1718 AN, Felipe subsequently became embroiled in a naval procurement scandal whilst serving as Secretary of Defense in the administration of his successor.

• Presidency of Felipe de Almagro (1708–1718)
• Presidency of Paolo Antonio Aguilar (1718–1729)

Zarzuela as Leader

• Administration of Premier Juan Pablo Jimenez (1739–1749)
• Administration of Premier José Manuel Montero (1750– )

Organisation

Overview

• Federal Humanist Party
  • Offices of the Archonate
    • Grand Convocation of Humanism
  • Central Secretariat
    • Corps d'Tirailleurs Alexandrin
    • Central Control Commission
    • Central Publishing Organisation
      • Le Nouveau Siècle
    • Association humaniste de voile de Nouvelle-Alexandrie
  • Regional Sector Parties (×12)
    • Regional Sector Party Leadership Cadre
    • N&H Vanguard Group
    • Young Humanists League
    • Association of Humanist Institutes
    • Chamber of Humanist Guilds and Corporations

Culture

Sartorial standards

In general terms, the business suit and tie, so favoured by politicians, is to be abhorred by members of the FHP. A civil cut of the N&H uniform is to be preferred - namely a plain black tunic with a mandarin collar, grey jodhpur trousers and brown leather boots. For headgear, men are expected to don a black fez or field cap, whilst women have a choice between the black turban, veil, or scarf to serve as a hair covering. A member of the FHP is expected to confirm to the party's standards for attire when engaged in party or public business, excepting occasions where a uniform of the royal court or the federal services is more appropriate.

As noted, the FHP enjoys dispensation for its membership to wear a civil cut of the N&H regulation uniform. This allows a certain freedom in the tailoring for following the trends of fashion and regional or cultural flare.

Ideology

Humanism

"The glory of humanity is that it can be pack and herd at once, and the greatest refinement, the one that permits surplus and complexity was the translation in predation from despoliation to husbandry."

—Alexander Melas, Lecture on the Human Supremacy, given at the Royal University of Parap, 1750 AN.

Humanist doctrine can be articulated in six axiomatic propositions:

Humanity alone among consequential terrestrial species has perfected collaborative predation to the point where it can systematically domesticate, breed, harvest, and redesign every other life-form and most inorganic processes. The translation of raw despoliation into husbandry is not merely an economic event; it is the ontological event that places Homo sapiens at the apex of the biosphere and, increasingly, the geosphere. All other species exist, in the final analysis, as substrates for human surplus extraction.

The capacity to generate, concentrate, and redeploy surplus energy is the only meaningful metric of supremacy. Civilisations that maximise surplus demonstrate their superiority by the sheer scale of transformed landscape, population density, monumental construction, and technological reach. Those that fail to do not merely decline; they forfeit their claim to supremacy and are rightly absorbed or erased by those who succeed.

Complex surplus extraction and allocation cannot occur without durable, stratified command structures. Hierarchy is therefore not a lamentable side-effect of civilisation; it is the enabling instrument of human dominion over the continents of Micras. Every attempt to flatten or abolish hierarchy has either collapsed into the barbarism of the Green or been violently terminated by the reimposition of order by a new elite. Supremacy and hierarchy are, in practice, synonymous.

Humanity is simultaneously the most ferocious pack predator and the most docile, scalable herd animal. This duality allows it to switch registers at will: to raid, innovate, and conquer as wolves, then to accumulate, administer, and compound as sheep. No other species possesses this double articulation. It is the biological root of planetary mastery.

Sentience, suffering, or ecological “balance” in other species possesses no intrinsic claim against human surplus requirements. The lamb exists for the shepherd, the forest for the shipyard, the river for the turbine. Any ethic that places non-human claims on equal footing with human supremacy is a form of civilisational auto-immune disease. The conservation of any portion of nature is therefore not on account of the flora and fauna that might be the immediate subject of preservation, but rather because humans arise from and operate within the ultimate complex system – nature itself - and are entitled to the proper enjoyment of it thereof in its authentic context.

Because human desire is effectively infinite while terrestrial resources are finite, the only consistent expression of supremacy is continual outward expansion (geographical, demographic, technological, and eventually extra-planetary). Any steady-state, zero-growth, or “sustainable” posture is a renunciation of supremacy and an invitation to be overtaken by a less scrupulous lineage of the species.

From these six propositions a complete doctrine follows naturally: Micras and all its contents are rightfully the estate of mankind. The proper order of humanity is one that maximises surplus, refines hierarchy, and accelerates expansion.

Any ideology, movement, or technical arrangement that impedes these imperatives (deep ecology, rhizomatic anarchism, thermodynamic resignation, animal rights absolutism) is objectively treason against the project that is the Human Supremacy.

The supreme political virtue is therefore the statesmanship that safeguards and enlarges the conditions of surplus: strong property rights, elite circulation disciplined by merit and ruthlessness, continuous scientific domination of nature, and the willingness to deploy overwhelming violence against any internal or external challenge to the chain of command.

This is not a doctrine that requires mystical justification or promises utopian reward. It requires only the cold recognition that humanity has already won the tournament of species, and that the only remaining question is which human lineage will inherit the spoils.

FHP governments

• Presidency of Augustus Strong
• Presidency of Gerhardt Eugen Seydlitz
• Presidency of Felipe de Almagro
• Presidency of Paolo Antonio Aguilar
• Administration of Premier Juan Pablo Jimenez
• Administration of Premier José Manuel Montero