Force 1752 initiative

Force 1752 Initiative
	New Alexandrian Defense Modernization Program
	Budget: NAX€ 7.3 trillion (1740 AN-1752 AN)
	Defense spending target: 4% of GDP
	File:Force1752Logo.png ; Official logo of the Force 1752 Initiative
Program Details
Completion Date	15.XV.1752 AN
Status	Active implementation
Key Objectives
Primary	Force Structure Modernization
Secondary	Equipment Recapitalization
Tertiary	Strategic Forces Enhancement
Additional	Industrial Base Development
Major Funding Allocations
Federal Navy	38% (NAX€ 2.77 trillion)
Grand Army	31% (NAX€ 2.26 trillion)
Federal Air Force	22% (NAX€ 1.61 trillion)
Federal Space Force	5% (NAX€ 365 billion)
Federal Guards	4% (NAX€ 292 billion)
	Cornerstone defense policy of the Jimenez administration (1739 AN-present)
	This box: view · talk

This article or section is a work in progress. The information below may be incomplete, outdated, or subject to change.

The Force 1752 Initiative is a comprehensive military modernization and procurement program launched by the Federal Humanist Party government of Nouvelle Alexandrie in 1740 AN following the Agreement for Stable Governance. The initiative aims to increase the Federation's defense spending to 4% of GDP by 1742 AN and maintain this level through 1752 AN, representing the largest peacetime military investment in the nation's history. The program derives its name from its target completion year (1752 AN) and focuses on strengthening all branches of the Federal Forces of Nouvelle Alexandrie while prioritizing manufacturers from Raspur Pact member states.

Announced by Premier Juan Pablo Jimenez during a special session of the Federal Assembly on 15.I.1740 AN, the Force 1752 Initiative represents a cornerstone policy of the FHP minority government. The program encompasses comprehensive equipment modernization, force structure reforms, personnel expansion, and industrial capacity development across the Federation's military establishment.

Background

The initiative was developed during a period of profound geopolitical transformation that significantly altered the strategic landscape for Nouvelle Alexandrie. The East Keltian Collapse (1736 AN-1738 AN) witnessed the disintegration of two key New Alexandrian allies, Normark and Anahuaco, creating a massive power vacuum in northern and eastern Keltia. This collapse resulted in the absorption of over 10 million refugees by Nouvelle Alexandrie and opened vast territories to potential exploitation by non-aligned powers like the Confederacy of the Dispossessed and Bassaridia Vaeringheim. Simultaneously, the Benacian War (1738 AN-1741 AN) between Shireroth and the Benacian Union (both key Raspur Pact members) significantly reshaped the regional balance of power. The conflict concluded with the Treaty of Lorsdam, resulting in Shireroth's victory and its subsequent departure from the Pact. This left the Benacian Union fragmented and significantly weakened, fundamentally altering power dynamics within the alliance system. The reconfiguration of the Raspur Pact following these events necessitated a reevaluation of security commitments and capabilities among remaining members. With Shireroth's departure and the Benacian Union's diminished capacity, greater responsibility fell to the remaining countries in the Raspur Pact, including Nouvelle Alexandrie.

On the domestic front, several key factors influenced the initiative's development. The Spring Crisis of 1739 had exposed critical vulnerabilities in military command structures and equipment, highlighting the need for comprehensive reform. Many service branches were operating with aging equipment, particularly naval vessels commissioned in the early 1700s that required urgent replacement or modernization. The need to maintain technological parity with other major Raspur Pact member states served as another driving factor, particularly as regional competitors accelerated their own military modernization programs. Additionally, industrial policy objectives aimed at stimulating economic growth following the Recession of 1737 aligned perfectly with a major defense procurement initiative.

Notably, the program was developed in close consultation with the Liberty and Prosperity Alliance and the Gang of 21 independents during the negotiations after the 1739 general elections to form a government. These parliamentary partners also secured important provisions requiring that 35% of contracts involve private sector partnerships and emphasizing domestic manufacturing capacity development, ensuring broader economic benefits beyond pure military considerations.

Concord Alliance

The Force 1752 Initiative strategically complements the parallel development of the Concord Alliance Treaty Organization (CATO), a security framework established between Nouvelle Alexandrie, Natopia, Oportia, and Vegno. The military capabilities developed through Force 1752 are specifically designed for versatility, enhancing Nouvelle Alexandrie's contributions to both security frameworks with particular attention to naval and air assets that can support CATO operations. This dual-purpose approach reflects New Alexandrie's evolving strategic posture as a bridge between security architectures of the Raspur Pact and CATO.

Key Objectives

The Force 1752 Initiative has five strategic objectives:

Force Structure Modernization: Reorganize the Federal Forces of Nouvelle Alexandrie to enhance operational flexibility, joint operations capability, and rapid deployment capacity;
Equipment Recapitalization: Replace aging platforms across all service branches with next-generation systems;
Strategic Forces Enhancement: Continue nuclear disarmament, deploy the NOVA Shield, expand cyber capabilities and space-based assets;
Industrial Base Development: Expand domestic defense industrial capacity through strategic public-private partnerships;
Personnel Quality Improvement: Increase recruitment, retention, and training quality while implementing reforms from Operation Clean Hands;
Rapid Response Capability: Develop specialized forces capable of responding to emerging threats in the Keltian Green and other contested areas resulting from regional power vacuums.

Major Programs

Grand Army of the Federation

Federal Navy

Federal Air Force

Federal Space Force

Federal Guards Service

Industrial Strategy

Major Contractors

New Alexandrian

Javelin Industries: Prime contractor for aircraft, missiles, and unmanned aerial systems.
Pontecorvo Firm: Prime contractor for naval vessel construction, including surface combatants and submarines.
ESB Susa: Prime contractor for integrated command systems, communications networks, and electronic warfare capabilities.
Ahvaz Automotive Engineering Company: Prime contractor for military transport vehicles and logistics systems.
National Qullqa System: Prime contractor for military logistics, supply chain management, and infrastructure development.
Sarbanes-Lopez Cybersecurity: Prime contractor for advanced computing systems, military automation platforms, and autonomous weapons technology.
Fountainpen Corporation: Prime contractor for electromagnetic systems integration, specializing in AI-enhanced electronic warfare capabilities and autonomous electromagnetic countermeasure technologies.
Rimarima Armaments: Prime contractor for next-generation combat vehicles and infantry weapons systems, with specialized focus on modular battlefield solutions.

International

Mishalan Arsenal ( Benacian Union): Key partner for armored vehicle development and production, with increased role following the Benacian War.
Akeraiótita Dockyards ( Constancia): Partner for naval systems integration and missile technologies.
Luix-Satyria Scientific-Production Association ( Natopia): Partner for advanced sensors, electronic systems, and space technologies, with expanded role reflecting stronger CATO ties.
Neridia Defense Industries ( Natopia): Partner for tanks and other land weapons.
Dingo Enterprises ( Natopia): Partner for electronic systems and space technologies.

Implementation and Oversight

Budget and Economic Impact

The Force 1752 Initiative has a total budget allocation of NAX€ 7.3 trillion through 1752 AN, representing approximately 4% of GDP annually from 1742 AN onward. The funding distribution across fiscal years is structured to allow gradual industrial ramp-up:

Fiscal Year	Budget (NAX€ billions)	% of GDP
1740 AN	580	3.2%
1741 AN	680	3.6%
1742 AN	760	4.0%
1743 AN	790	4.0%
1744 AN	820	4.0%
1745 AN	850	4.0%
1746 AN	880	4.0%
1747 AN	910	4.0%
1748 AN	940	4.0%
1749 AN	970	4.0%
1750 AN	1,000	4.0%
1751 AN	1,030	4.0%
1752 AN	1,070	4.0%

Controversies and Opposition

The Force 1752 Initiative has faced significant criticism since its announcement, with controversies emerging regarding its implementation, cost structure, and strategic priorities.

Implementation Challenges

Schedule Delays and Cost Overruns

By mid-1742 AN, several key programs had already experienced notable delays. The Federal Navy's next-generation destroyer program fell eight months behind schedule due to technical integration challenges between Pontecorvo Firm's hull design and imported weapons systems from Constancian partners. These delays triggered contractual penalties estimated at NAX€780 million and required a NAX€1.2 billion supplemental appropriation to address technical issues.

The Grand Army's infantry combat vehicle program experienced a 22% cost overrun during initial production phases, with per-unit costs increasing from NAX€4.2 million to NAX€5.1 million. A report by the Federal Assembly's Defense Oversight Committee attributed these increases to "inadequate initial requirements definition and insufficient market research prior to contract award."

Production Capacity Constraints

Industrial capacity limitations have emerged as a significant implementation challenge. Domestic manufacturers, particularly Javelin Industries and ESB Susa, have struggled to ramp up production capacity at the pace required by procurement schedules. This has led to delivery backlogs and forced the Department of Defense to grant timeline extensions to several prime contractors, further delaying capability deployment.

The strain on production capacity became especially evident in Q2 1742 AN, when three major production facilities reported workforce shortages exceeding 15% of required skilled labor. This triggered emergency workforce development initiatives and recruitment campaigns offering significant wage premiums for specialized manufacturing positions.

Strategic Controversies

Balance of Investments

Military analysts from the Institute for Defense Studies have criticized the initiative's heavy emphasis on conventional forces, arguing that it fails to adequately address asymmetric threats and non-traditional security challenges. Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie leader Gabrielle Fitzgerald publicly questioned whether "investing 38% of the budget in naval assets reflects the actual threat environment facing the Federation."

The allocation of only 5% to the Federal Space Force has drawn particular criticism from security experts who argue that space-based capabilities represent a critical domain for future conflicts. Admiral (ret.) Elena Rodriguez characterized this as "prioritizing platforms of the past over capabilities of the future."

Procurement Strategy Controversies

The initiative's procurement strategy has faced scrutiny regarding the balance between domestic and international sourcing. While the program mandates that 65% of manufacturing occur within Nouvelle Alexandrie, opposition parties have argued that certain critical systems could be produced more efficiently domestically with greater investment in industrial capacity.

Former Premier Marissa Santini criticized the extensive reliance on Benacian Union suppliers following that nation's defeat and fragmentation, questioning whether "hitching our defense industrial base to a weakened ally represents sound strategic thinking."

Political and Economic Opposition

Budgetary Priorities Debate

The Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie has consistently opposed the initiative's funding levels, with Parliamentary Leader Gabrielle Fitzgerald introducing three separate budget amendments attempting to redirect approximately NAX€120 billion annually from Force 1752 toward housing and social programs. In a high-profile speech to the Federal Assembly, Fitzgerald argued: "While the government invests trillions in weapons systems, millions of New Alexandrians cannot afford decent housing. These priorities reflect a fundamental misalignment with the needs of our citizens."

Independent economic analysts from the National Economic Research Institute have questioned the initiative's opportunity costs, suggesting that investments of similar scale in sustainable energy, transportation infrastructure, or education would generate 40-60% more jobs and greater long-term economic benefits.

Regional Disparities

The economic benefits of Force 1752 have been unevenly distributed across the Federation, generating political tensions. While regions with established defense industrial bases like Alduria and the Wechua Nation have seen significant economic boosts, regions like Valencia and New Caputia have received disproportionately fewer contracts and investments.

Oversight Concerns

A report by the Federal Comptroller's Office in VIII.1742 AN identified "significant weaknesses" in program oversight mechanisms, particularly regarding subcontractor management and performance metrics. The report documented instances where prime contractors delegated critical work to subcontractors without adequate quality control measures, resulting in components failing to meet military specifications.

The Military Reform Commission, established following the Spring Crisis of 1739, has expressed concern that rapid procurement under Force 1752 could potentially undermine the governance reforms implemented through Operation Clean Hands if proper oversight is not maintained.

Despite these controversies, the Jimenez government has maintained its commitment to the initiative, pointing to its economic benefits and contribution to national security as justification for the substantial investment. Defense Secretary Jose Manuel Montero has acknowledged implementation challenges while emphasizing that "any undertaking of this scale will face obstacles, but the security of our Federation demands that we persevere."