This is an article related to Nouvelle Alexandrie. Click here for more information.

New Alexandrian general election, 1739

From MicrasWiki
Revision as of 23:16, 10 December 2024 by Edgard (talk | contribs) (National)
Jump to navigationJump to search

{{{1}}} This article or section is a work in progress. The information below may be incomplete, outdated, or subject to change.
New Alexandrian general election, 1739

1734 ←
→ 1744

All 689 seats to the Federal Assembly
345 seats needed for a majority
 
Leader Marrissa Santini Juan Pablo Jimenez Gabrielle Fitzgerald
Party Federal Consensus Party Federal Humanist Party Democratic Socialist Party
Leader since 1726 AN 1736 AN 1724 AN
Leader's seat Santander Santander Wechua Nation
Last election 326, 46.5% 196, 28.4% 62, 10.0%

 
Leader Mayani Guacanagari
Beatriz Daguao
Pablo Alvelo Nieves Alejandro Vega
Party Wakara People's Party United for Alvelo Liberty & Prosperity Alliance
Alliance Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie
Leader since 1722 AN 1722 AN 1734 AN
Leader's seat Boriquén (Regional Party) Santander (Regional Party) Alduria
Last election 24, 3.9% 25, 3.9% 39, 5.7%

 
Leader None.
Party Independent


Leader since No leader.
Leader's seat No leader.
Last election 17, 2.0%

Incumbent President of the Government

Marissa Santini (FCP)

The New Alexandrian general election of 1739 is scheduled to be held from 7.XI.1739 AN to 9.XI.1739 AN to elect members of the Federal Assembly, the lower house of the Cortes Federales. This highly contested election comes at the end of Marissa Santini's turbulent second term as Premier, marked by multiple crises including the Recession of 1737, the East Keltian Collapse, the reemergence of the Confederacy of the Dispossessed, and most dramatically, the Spring Crisis of 1739 attempted coup. The election will determine all 689 seats in the Federal Assembly, with 345 seats needed for a majority.

The Federal Consensus Party (FCP) government under Premier Santini has faced significant challenges during its second term, particularly regarding the cost of living crisis that saw housing prices in major cities rise by 45% between 1737 AN and 1739 AN, alongside growing healthcare accessibility concerns as regional hospital systems struggled with refugee influxes. The government's handling of over 10 million Anahuacano and 100,000 Norse refugees sparked intense debate, while its fiscal response to the Recession of 1737 drew both praise for preventing economic collapse and criticism for perceived inflationary effects. However, the Santini government's resolute handling of the Spring Crisis and subsequent military reforms under Operation Clean Hands has garnered widespread approval.

The political landscape has shifted significantly in the wake of these events. The Federal Humanist Party (FHP) under Juan Pablo Jimenez has positioned itself as the champion of military modernization and stricter refugee policies, while also advocating for aggressive housing development programs. The Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA) has gained substantial support on the left by promoting expanded social housing initiatives (with an option of rent-to-own for families and individuals) and universal healthcare access, incorporating the Democratic Socialist Party (DSP), Wakara People's Party (WPP), and United for Alvelo (UfA) into a broader progressive coalition. The emergent Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) has carved out a unique position combining economic liberalism with suburban conservatism, advocating for market-based solutions to the housing crisis and healthcare reform through privatization and deregulation.

Recent economic indicators have shown promising signs for the incumbent FCP, with inflation dropping to 4.2% by X.1739 AN, driven by booming Alexandrium exports, increased defense industry activity, and a surge in construction sector growth. Pre-election polling shows the FCP maintaining a narrow lead over the FHP, while the AJNA has risen to third place, and the LPA to fourth. The election is expected to be highly competitive across all regions, with particular focus on suburban districts where cost of living issues and refugee integration have become decisive factors. Electoral authorities anticipate high turnout, especially given heightened civic engagement following the Spring Crisis of 1739.

Background

New Alexandrian General Election, 1739

The New Alexandrian general election of 1739 took place against the backdrop of significant political and social upheaval, most notably the Spring Crisis of 1739, an attempted military coup by elements of the III Combined Arms Corps that was ultimately defeated by loyal military units, the King of Nouvelle Alexandrie, and civilian resistance. While Premier Marissa Santini's government initially received praise for its handling of the crisis, subsequent scrutiny focused on intelligence failures that had allowed the plot to develop.

Political Context

Premier Santini, who came to power in the historic election of 1729, ended the Federal Humanist Party's 15-year electoral dominance. Her tenure was characterized by diplomatic achievements, including the establishment of the Concord Alliance (CATO) and successful management of the refugee crisis during the East Keltian Collapse. However, domestic challenges, particularly a prolonged cost-of-living crisis, began to erode her popularity despite signs of broader economic recovery.

The Santini government operated as a minority administration, relying on issue-by-issue support from the Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie (AJNA). This arrangement proved contentious, especially after the Federal Consensus Party (FCP) collaborated with the Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) on research and development legislation, straining relations with AJNA. Throughout her tenure, Santini faced significant challenges in passing budgets and emergency spending plans, often requiring delicate negotiations to secure support from either AJNA or, occasionally, the FHP. While this dynamic ensured the passage of transformative budgets delivering unprecedented investments in infrastructure, social services, defense, and healthcare, it also eroded Santini's political capital and left the FCP vulnerable to opposition attacks.

Party Dynamics

As the election approached, the Federal Humanist Party (FHP) had begun recovering from years of internal discord under the new leadership of Juan Pablo Jimenez and Daniela Obregon y Zarzuela in 1736 AN, though struggled to regain support among moderate and independent voters. AJNA, under Gabrielle Fitzgerald's leadership, successfully united the Democratic Socialist Party, Wakara People's Party, and United for Alvelo, gaining support from labor unions and the Nouveau Wave cultural movement. Meanwhile, the FCP worked to maintain its coalition while defending its record of compromise and pragmatic governance.

Monarchy and Democracy

A significant pro-democracy and pro-monarchy movement emerged following the Spring Crisis, with King Sinchi Roca II and Queen Adelaide of Natopia becoming symbols of national unity. The movement championed the monarchy as a stabilizing institution while advocating for stronger democratic safeguards. A notable public following developed around the royal couple, influencing political discourse and campaign rhetoric across party lines. While the broader movement focused on reinforcing democratic values and constitutional order, the increased prominence of the monarchy in public life sparked debates about its role in modern democratic governance.

Election Issues

The 1739 election centered primarily on economic concerns, particularly the ongoing cost-of-living crisis that continued to strain household budgets despite broader economic recovery. Housing affordability in major urban centers like Cárdenas, Punta Santiago, and Parap emerged as a critical issue. Military pension reform and veterans' support gained prominence following the Spring Crisis, while environmental policy divided parties along ideological lines. National defense modernization and budget allocation became contentious topics, with debates focusing on the balance between security needs and social service funding. Democratic reforms and constitutional reinforcement also featured prominently in campaign discussions, reflecting public concern about institutional stability following the attempted coup.

Electoral System

Elections in Nouvelle Alexandrie operate on a system of proportional representation, conducted region by region. Voters have the option to choose either from party lists or independent slates that appear on the ballot. The electoral system employs the Sainte-Laguë method, the highest quotient system, for allocating seats in each region's party-list proportional representation. This ensures a more equitable distribution of seats according to vote shares. The legal threshold for any party to gain representation in a given region is 2% of the total votes.

Upon the conclusion of the elections, if a party achieves a majority of seats in the Federal Assembly, it is entitled to form the government. The leader of the winning party then assumes the position of President of the Government. In instances where no party secures an outright majority, resulting in a hung Cortes Federales, the country's governance can proceed in one of two main ways: either through the formation of a coalition government comprised of multiple parties or a minority government that governs with the external support of other parties, all in strict accordance with Nouvelle Alexandrie’s legal framework.

Date of the Election

The deadline for candidate nominations was 1.V.1734 AN, with official political campaigning starting on 1.I.1739 AN until the last polling day on 9.XI.1739 AN. Between the election dates, 7.XI to 9.XI.1739 AN, polling stations across the country will be open from 6:00am local time and close at 10pm local time.

Voting Eligibility

Opinion Polling

Contesting Parties

Federal Consensus Party Campaign

Federal Humanist Party Campaign

Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie

Democratic Socialist Party Campaign

Wakara People's Party Campaign

United for Alvelo Campaign

Liberty and Prosperity Alliance Campaign

Candidates

Results

National

Color Political Party Leader Candidates Votes % of Votes Elected % of Seats Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) Maximilian de Almagro 689 97,680,692 44.66% 314 45.6% +118
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) Marissa Santini 689 51,467,650 23.53% 164 23.8% -162
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) Gabrielle Fitzgerald 689 40,854,635 18.68% 127 18.4% +65
United for Alvelo (UfA) Pablo Alvelo Nieves 123 8,349,022 3.82% 28 4.1% +3
Independent & Unaligned No leader. 2,397 8,412,210 3.85% 24 3.5% -32
Wakara People's Party (WPP) 34 6,984,906 3.19% 20 2.9% -4
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) Alejandro Vega 689 4,984,127 2.28% 12 1.7% New Party.
Total 4,032 218,733,242 100% 689 100% Steady
Turnout: <Placeholder for Turnout>

Regional

Alduria

Election Results in the Region of Alduria
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 20,844,267 45.83% 68 +23
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 10,621,239 23.35% 35 +35
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 10,288,710 22.62% 33 -47
Independent/Unaligned 2,588,369 5.69% 8 -15
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 1,138,486 2.50% 4 +4
Totals: 45,481,071 Votes, 148 Deputies

Wechua Nation

Election Results in the Region of the Wechua Nation
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 19,055,378 44.93% 62 +29
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 10,615,863 25.03% 35 +18
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 9,606,501 22.65% 31 -49
Independent/Unaligned 2,047,721 4.83% 7 -1
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 1,089,488 2.57% 3 +3
Totals: 42,414,951 Votes, 138 Deputies

Santander

Election Results in the Region of Santander
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 12,005,958 42.32% 40 +21
United for Alvelo (UfA) 7,669,858 27.04% 26 +3
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 6,845,083 24.13% 23 -15
Independent/Unaligned 951,788 3.35% 3 -1
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 528,101 1.86% 0 Steady 0
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 368,711 1.30% 0 -7
Totals: 28,369,499 Votes, 92 Deputies

Valencia

Election Results in the Region of Valencia
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 4,548,038 41.68% 13 +7
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 3,430,914 31.45% 10 -5
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 1,821,405 16.69% 5 -2
United for Alvelo (UfA) 679,164 6.22% 2 Steady 0
Independent/Unaligned 249,521 2.29% 1 Steady 0
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 181,470 1.66% 0 Steady 0
Totals: 10,910,512 Votes, 31 Deputies

Federal Capital District

Election Results in the Federal Capital District
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 295,250 47.60% 1 Steady 0
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 198,035 31.93% 1 +1
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 93,700 15.11% 0 Steady 0
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 27,644 4.46% 0 Steady 0
Independent/Unaligned 5,587 0.90% 0 -1
Totals: 620,216 Votes, 2 Deputies

Isles of Caputia

Election Results in the Region of Isles of Caputia
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 13,200,732 67.34% 39 +10
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 3,854,256 19.66% 12 -16
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 1,755,118 8.95% 5 +5
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 439,097 2.24% 1 +1
Independent/Unaligned 354,725 1.81% 0 -1
Totals: 19,603,928 Votes, 57 Deputies

New Luthoria

Election Results in the Region of New Luthoria
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 1,478,266 34.48% 4 +3
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 1,339,982 31.25% 4 -3
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 1,285,570 29.98% 4 Steady 0
Independent/Unaligned 116,367 2.71% 0 Steady 0
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 67,330 1.57% 0 Steady 0
Totals: 4,287,515 Votes, 12 Deputies

North Lyrica

Election Results in the Region of North Lyrica
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 13,707,603 75.87% 46 +18
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 1,846,229 10.22% 6 -16
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 1,446,188 8.00% 5 +5
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 767,191 4.25% 3 +3
Independent/Unaligned 300,152 1.66% 0 -11
Totals: 18,067,363 Votes, 60 Deputies

South Lyrica

Election Results in the Region of South Lyrica
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 7,893,641 32.56% 24 +2
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 7,580,975 31.27% 23 +8
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 7,314,137 30.17% 23 -10
Independent/Unaligned 1,129,518 4.66% 4 +1
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 321,995 1.33% 0 Steady 0
Totals: 24,240,266 Votes, 74 Deputies

Islas de la Libertad

Election Results in the Region of Islas de la Libertad
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 2,056,965 42.17% 6 -2
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 1,843,064 37.79% 5 +2
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 655,118 13.43% 2 -2
Wakara People's Party (WPP) - 0.00% - -
United for Alvelo (UfA) - 0.00% - -
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 67,515 1.38% - -
Independent/Unaligned 254,666 5.22% 1 +1
Totals: 4,877,328 Votes, 14 Deputies

Boriquén

Election Results in the Region of Boriquén
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Wakara People's Party (WPP) 6,984,906 59.41% 20 -4
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 1,984,209 16.88% 6 -2
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 1,459,351 12.41% 4 -3
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 1,010,396 8.59% 3 Steady
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 101,078 0.86% - -
Independent/Unaligned 218,045 1.85% - Steady
United for Alvelo (UfA) - 0.00% - -
Totals: 11,757,985 Votes, 33 Deputies

New Caputia

Election Results in the Region of New Caputia
Party Votes % of Votes Deputies Gain/Loss
Federal Humanist Party (FHP) 4,678,354 57.74% 17 +5
Federal Consensus Party (FCP) 2,605,414 32.16% 9 -3
Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) 368,357 4.55% 1 +1
Liberty and Prosperity Alliance (LPA) 254,732 3.14% 1 -
Independent/Unaligned 195,751 2.42% - -
Wakara People's Party (WPP) - 0.00% - -
United for Alvelo (UfA) - 0.00% - -
Totals: 8,102,608 Votes, 28 Deputies

Analysis

See Also

References