This is a Hurmu article. Click here for more information.
This is a Çakaristan article. Click here for more information.
This is a member of the Line of Woodrow. Click here for more information.

Ümit Çakar: Difference between revisions

From MicrasWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Çakaristan Article}}
{{Woodrow Article}}
'''Ümit Çakar''' (1637 - 1723 AN) is a [[Krasnocoria]]n [[Hasanis|Hasani]] academician, politician and activist, who was the chairman of the [[Hasani National Council]] pressure group and Professor of Sociology at the [[University of Šer-ku-Riž]]. He was born in [[Šer-ku-Riž]], [[Hasanistan]], then part of [[Krasnarus]].  
'''Ümit Çakar''' (1637 - 1723 AN) is a [[Krasnocoria]]n [[Hasanis|Hasani]] academician, politician and activist, who was the chairman of the [[Hasani National Council]] pressure group and Professor of Sociology at the [[University of Šer-ku-Riž]]. He was born in [[Šer-ku-Riž]], [[Hasanistan]], then part of [[Krasnarus]].  


Line 11: Line 13:


[[Category:Krasnarus]][[Category:people]]
[[Category:Krasnarus]][[Category:people]]
[[Category:Living members of the Order of the Holy Lakes]]
[[Category:Deceased members of the Order of the Holy Lakes]]{{Hurmu article}}

Latest revision as of 12:18, 18 May 2024

Ümit Çakar (1637 - 1723 AN) is a Krasnocorian Hasani academician, politician and activist, who was the chairman of the Hasani National Council pressure group and Professor of Sociology at the University of Šer-ku-Riž. He was born in Šer-ku-Riž, Hasanistan, then part of Krasnarus.

Married to Hamida Banu. Father of Hasan Çakar (1665 – 1694 AN), Amir Çakar (1667– ) and Abu Çakar (Akbar) (1669 – 1704 AN). Abu Çakar was the Sultan of Çakaristan. He died in 1723 AN, in his birthplace and is buried there.

Career

Academic career

Political activism

Controversies

Çakar is a controversial figure within both the Hasani independence movement and the wider population of Krasnarus. Within the independence movement, some refer to him as one of its wisest and most important figures while others refer to him as a liability to the movement and criticize his eccentric behavior.