New Alexandrian general election, 1698: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
At the end of the [[New Alexandrian general election, 1693|1693 general election]], the death of Marcel de la Croix and the pronounced disruption this caused on the process of forming a government led to the [[Federal Humanist Party]],[[Cambio_Democratico_(Nouvelle_Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]], and the [[Digger's Society]] forming a Government of National Unity. Soon after the assassination of de la Croix and just several hours before the deadline to form a government passed, [[Augustus Strong]], leader of the [[Federal Humanist Party]] and ''formateur'', announced that agreement on a unity government had been reached. The deal would involve the two largest parties sharing power, with Strong and Santiago Etienne of [[Cambio_Democratico_(Nouvelle_Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] taking turns being [[Council of State of Nouvelle Alexandrie|President and Vice-President of the Government]]. Both would exchange roles every AN year, with Strong beginning the rotation. | At the end of the [[New Alexandrian general election, 1693|1693 general election]], the death of Marcel de la Croix and the pronounced disruption this caused on the process of forming a government led to the [[Federal Humanist Party]],[[Cambio_Democratico_(Nouvelle_Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]], and the [[Digger's Society]] forming a Government of National Unity. Soon after the assassination of de la Croix and just several hours before the deadline to form a government passed, [[Augustus Strong]], leader of the [[Federal Humanist Party]] and ''formateur'', announced that agreement on a unity government had been reached. The deal would involve the two largest parties sharing power, with Strong and Santiago Etienne of [[Cambio_Democratico_(Nouvelle_Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] taking turns being [[Council of State of Nouvelle Alexandrie|President and Vice-President of the Government]]. Both would exchange roles every AN year, with Strong beginning the rotation. | ||
In {{AN|1697}}, changes to the active status registration of several political parties that maintained caucuses in the Federal Assembly resulted in the dissolution of several parties, including the second largest party and a member of the Government of National Unity, [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]]. This resulted in Deputies that were members of [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] to defect to either the [[Federal Humanist Party]], the successor to the [[Progressive Federalist Party]], the [[Solidarity Party]], or to the successor of [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]], the [[Progressive Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Progressive Party]]. This required the Government of National Unity to reconstitute, this time, replacing [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] with the [[Solidarity Party]]. | In {{AN|1697}}, changes to the active status registration of several political parties that maintained caucuses in the Federal Assembly resulted in the dissolution of several parties, including the second largest party and a member of the Government of National Unity, [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]]. This resulted in Deputies that were members of [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] to defect to either the [[Federal Humanist Party]], the successor to the [[Progressive Federalist Party]], the [[Solidarity Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Solidarity Party]], or to the successor of [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]], the [[Progressive Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Progressive Party]]. This required the Government of National Unity to reconstitute, this time, replacing [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] with the [[Solidarity Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Solidarity Party]]. | ||
In the lead up to the general election, negotiations between the [[Solidarity Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Solidarity Party]] and the [[Progressive Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Progressive Party]] led to the founding of a new party, the [[Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance]] (SD&LA). The negotiations were slow and acrimonious at first, but the advance in the polls of the [[Federal Humanist Party]] and its successes in [[Operation Paramount]] and other policy matters prompted both parties to come to an agreement to form a broad big tent coalition of the left in order to be able to compete. | In the lead up to the general election, negotiations between the [[Solidarity Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Solidarity Party]] and the [[Progressive Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Progressive Party]] led to the founding of a new party, the [[Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance]] (SD&LA). The negotiations were slow and acrimonious at first, but the advance in the polls of the [[Federal Humanist Party]] and its successes in [[Operation Paramount]] and other policy matters prompted both parties to come to an agreement to form a broad big tent coalition of the left in order to be able to compete. | ||
Line 210: | Line 210: | ||
==Campaigns== | ==Campaigns== | ||
The [[Federal Humanist Party]] and the [[Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance]] were the two largest political parties heading into the general election. They were both part of the previous Government of National Unity, the latter joining after the dissolution of [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] and the national political realignment of {{AN|1697}}. Out of the two, only the [[Federal Humanist Party]] has occupied the position of largest party in the [[Cortes Federales]] and also occupied the positions of [[Council of State of Nouvelle Alexandrie|President and Vice-President of the Government]]. | The [[Federal Humanist Party]] and the [[Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance]] were the two largest political parties heading into the general election. They were both part of the previous Government of National Unity, the latter joining after the dissolution of [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] and the national political realignment of {{AN|1697}}. Out of the two, only the [[Federal Humanist Party]] has occupied the position of largest party in the [[Cortes Federales]] and also occupied the positions of [[Council of State of Nouvelle Alexandrie|President and Vice-President of the Government]]. | ||
In {{AN|1697}}, the National Elections Commission announced that, due to inactivity of its leaders and party membership, [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] was losing official recognition as a political party, leading to the dissolution of its parliamentary caucus organization. This led to a national political realignment and changes to the composition of the 1st Cortes Federales. In the [[New Alexandrian general election, 1693|1693 general election]], [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] had secured 162 seats and served as the second largest political party in the Cortes Federales. After its dissolution, the [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] delegation started to either join another political party or remain independent. Four Deputies defected to the [[Federal Humanist Party]], 65 Deputies defected to the [[Solidarity Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Solidarity Party]], with 16 Deputies remaining unaligned. The 61 remaining Deputies decided to create their own political party, intended as a successor to [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]], called the [[Progressive Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Progressive Party]]. | In {{AN|1697}}, the National Elections Commission announced that, due to inactivity of its leaders and party membership, [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] was losing official recognition as a political party, leading to the dissolution of its parliamentary caucus organization. This led to a national political realignment and changes to the composition of the 1st Cortes Federales. In the [[New Alexandrian general election, 1693|1693 general election]], [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] had secured 162 seats and served as the second largest political party in the Cortes Federales. After its dissolution, the [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]] delegation started to either join another political party or remain independent. Four Deputies defected to the [[Federal Humanist Party]], 65 Deputies defected to the [[Solidarity Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Solidarity Party]], with 16 Deputies remaining unaligned. The 61 remaining Deputies decided to create their own political party, intended as a successor to [[Cambio Democrático (Nouvelle Alexandrie)|Cambio Democrático]], called the [[Progressive Party of Nouvelle Alexandrie|Progressive Party]]. |
Latest revision as of 21:58, 25 August 2021
This article or section is a work in progress. The information below may be incomplete, outdated, or subject to change. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The New Alexandrian general election of 1698 is the second general election of the Federation of Nouvelle Alexandrie after its formation in 1685 AN. The 1698 general election was held from 13.XV.1698 AN to 15.XV.1698 AN, in line with the Proclamation of Punta Santiago and the laws of Nouvelle Alexandrie. With 91,560,093 votes cast, the election had a 62.5% turnout, lower than the 1693 general election.
The election resulted in the Federal Humanist Party securing a majority in the Federal Assembly of 34 seats. The Federal Humanist Party made a net gain of 48 seats and won 56.6% of the popular vote – the highest percentage for any party since the creation of the Federation in 1675 AN.
The election took place across all ten Regions, each with its own number of seats based on population, under proportional representation.
Background
At the end of the 1693 general election, the death of Marcel de la Croix and the pronounced disruption this caused on the process of forming a government led to the Federal Humanist Party,Cambio Democrático, and the Digger's Society forming a Government of National Unity. Soon after the assassination of de la Croix and just several hours before the deadline to form a government passed, Augustus Strong, leader of the Federal Humanist Party and formateur, announced that agreement on a unity government had been reached. The deal would involve the two largest parties sharing power, with Strong and Santiago Etienne of Cambio Democrático taking turns being President and Vice-President of the Government. Both would exchange roles every AN year, with Strong beginning the rotation.
In 1697 AN, changes to the active status registration of several political parties that maintained caucuses in the Federal Assembly resulted in the dissolution of several parties, including the second largest party and a member of the Government of National Unity, Cambio Democrático. This resulted in Deputies that were members of Cambio Democrático to defect to either the Federal Humanist Party, the successor to the Progressive Federalist Party, the Solidarity Party, or to the successor of Cambio Democrático, the Progressive Party. This required the Government of National Unity to reconstitute, this time, replacing Cambio Democrático with the Solidarity Party.
In the lead up to the general election, negotiations between the Solidarity Party and the Progressive Party led to the founding of a new party, the Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance (SD&LA). The negotiations were slow and acrimonious at first, but the advance in the polls of the Federal Humanist Party and its successes in Operation Paramount and other policy matters prompted both parties to come to an agreement to form a broad big tent coalition of the left in order to be able to compete.
Dates of the election
The deadline for final candidate nominations was set for 11.III.1698 AN with political campaigning to last until the first polling day in 13.XV.1698 AN. The election was conducted over a period of three days, from 13.XV.1698 AN to 15.XV.1698 AN. Results were counted and published by the National Elections Commission on 16.XV.1698 AN. The three day period of the election was allowed in order to ensure that remote rural and insular areas could have some time to send their results, as well as to allow postal ballots to arrive to their destinations. This was the first election where New Alexandrians were allowed to vote by mail by going to their local polling station, confirming their identity, and picking up a ballot.
Eligibility to vote
Individuals eligible to vote had to be registered to vote by midnight on 10.XV.1698 AN, three days before the first day of polling. This was to allow the National Elections Commission system to electronically confirm the updates to the voter's rolls, confirmed with local and tax records for correct addresses and identities.
To be eligible to vote, individuals were required to be aged 18 or over, be a national of the Federation, and have been a resident in the Region they planned to vote in for at least six months prior to registration.
Opinion polling
Polling Firm | Date | FHP | SDL&A | DS | FP | Ind | MoE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Institute of Public Opinion | 13.1698 AN | 60% | 36% | 1% | 0% | 3% | ± 3% |
Electoral system
Elections in Nouvelle Alexandrie are conducted region by region through proportional representation. Voters then choose from the parties on the ballot or have the option to vote for a slate of independent candidates. Seats are apportioned to each region using the Sainte-Laguë method, a highest quotient method for allocating seats in party-list proportional representation. In Nouvelle Alexandrie, the thresholds for a party to get seats in a region is set to 2%. This election would be the last election where seats would be apportioned in accordance to the census conducted in 1693 AN, just before the 1693 general election.
Regional seat apportionment
Region | Seats | Population (1693 AN) | % of Seats |
---|---|---|---|
Alduria | 147 | 51,213,951 | 23.7% |
Wechua Nation | 138 | 48,208,871 | 22.2% |
Santander | 86 | 30,328,420 | 13.8% |
Valencia | 28 | 9,816,476 | 4.5% |
Federal Capital District | 2 | 712,987 | 0.3% |
Isles of Caputia | 61 | 21,321,762 | 9.8% |
North Lyrica | 61 | 21,291,128 | 9.8% |
South Lyrica | 65 | 22,987,652 | 10.5% |
New Luthoria | 19 | 6,812,981 | 3.0% |
Islas de la Libertad | 12 | 4,198,319 | 1.9% |
Totals | 619 | 216,892,547 | 100% |
Campaigns
The Federal Humanist Party and the Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance were the two largest political parties heading into the general election. They were both part of the previous Government of National Unity, the latter joining after the dissolution of Cambio Democrático and the national political realignment of 1697 AN. Out of the two, only the Federal Humanist Party has occupied the position of largest party in the Cortes Federales and also occupied the positions of President and Vice-President of the Government.
In 1697 AN, the National Elections Commission announced that, due to inactivity of its leaders and party membership, Cambio Democrático was losing official recognition as a political party, leading to the dissolution of its parliamentary caucus organization. This led to a national political realignment and changes to the composition of the 1st Cortes Federales. In the 1693 general election, Cambio Democrático had secured 162 seats and served as the second largest political party in the Cortes Federales. After its dissolution, the Cambio Democrático delegation started to either join another political party or remain independent. Four Deputies defected to the Federal Humanist Party, 65 Deputies defected to the Solidarity Party, with 16 Deputies remaining unaligned. The 61 remaining Deputies decided to create their own political party, intended as a successor to Cambio Democrático, called the Progressive Party.
Leading up to the 1698 AN general election, however, a movement called "Unite the Left" came into being when it became clear that neither of the two parties, the Solidarity Party and the Progressive Party, were independently capable of defeating the rising Federal Humanist Party. The objective of the movement was to merge the two parties into a single party (or, if this was not possible, to find a power-sharing arrangement between the two parties). Leaders and party members of both parties negotiated for several weeks and announced their merger and joint candidacy lists two days before candidacies closed for the 1698 general election with the formation of the Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance with Robert Beaujolais serving as its first leader.
Candidates
Most candidates are representatives of a political party, which must be registered with the National Elections Commmission and maintain regular activity and participation in politics. Those who do not belong to one must use the label "Independent" or none.
In the 1698 AN election 2,948 candidates stood: 472 of them being independents, the rest representing one of four national political parties.
Contesting Parties
Federal Humanist Campaign
Social Democratic & Liberal Campaign
Digger's Society Campaign
Freedom Party Campaign
Results
National
Political party | Leader | Candidates | Votes | Elected | Gain/loss | % of votes | % of seats | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federal Humanist Party | Gerhardt Eugen Seydlitz | 619 | 51,848,707 | 344 | ▲ 48 seats | 56.6% | 55.5% | |
Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance | Robert Beaujolais | 619 | 35,597,571 | 234 | ▲ 72 seats | 38.9% | 37.8% | |
Digger's Society | Iwashiiwa Kazuemon | 619 | 2,418,941 | 15 | No gain/loss | 2.4% | 2.6% | |
Freedom Party | Rufus Walberg | 619 | 1,694,874 | 5 | ▲ 2 seats | 0.8% | 1.9% | |
Independent | 472 | 3,330,395 | 21 | ▲ 21 seats | 3.6% | 3.3% | ||
Total | 2,948 | 91,560,093 | 619 | Turnout | 62.5% |
Regional
Alduria
Region of Alduria | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Vote % | Deputies |
Federal Humanist Party | 11,486,631 | 51.3% | 75 |
Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance | 9,238,174 | 41.2% | 61 |
Digger's Society | 717,354 | 3.2% | 5 |
Independent/Unaligned | 493,181 | 2.2% | 3 |
Freedom Party | 470,764 | 2.1% | 3 |
Totals | 22,406,104 | 100.0% | 147 |
Wechua Nation
Region of the Wechua Nation | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Vote % | Deputies |
Federal Humanist Party | 10,574,172 | 50.1% | 71 |
Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance | 8,323,047 | 39.5% | 55 |
Independent/Unaligned | 1,181,472 | 5.6% | 8 |
Digger's Society | 632,931 | 3.0% | 4 |
Freedom Party | 379,759 | 1.8% | 0 |
Totals | 21,091,381 | 100.0% | 138 |
Santander
Region of Santander | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Vote % | Deputies |
Federal Humanist Party | 6,800,234 | 51.3% | 45 |
Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance | 5,194,402 | 39.1% | 34 |
Independent/Unaligned | 769,738 | 5.8% | 5 |
Digger's Society | 278,698 | 2.1% | 2 |
Freedom Party | 225,613 | 1.7% | 0 |
Totals | 13,268,685 | 100.0% | 86 |
Valencia
Region of Valencia | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Vote % | Deputies |
Federal Humanist Party | 2,142,415 | 49.9% | 14 |
Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance | 1,727,075 | 40.2% | 11 |
Independent/Unaligned | 201,871 | 4.7% | 1 |
Digger's Society | 120,264 | 2.8% | 1 |
Freedom Party | 103,083 | 2.4% | 1 |
Totals | 4,294,708 | 100.0% | 28 |
Federal Capital District
Federal Capital District | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Vote % | Deputies |
Federal Humanist Party | 161,893 | 51.9% | 1 |
Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance | 132,571 | 42.5% | 1 |
Digger's Society | 12,789 | 4.1% | 0 |
Freedom Party | 4,679 | 1.5% | 0 |
Totals | 311,932 | 100.0% | 2 |
Isles of Caputia
Region of the Isles of Caputia | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Vote % | Deputies |
Federal Humanist Party | 5,867,618 | 62.9% | 39 |
Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance | 2,947,342 | 31.6% | 20 |
Digger's Society | 223,990 | 2.4% | 2 |
Independent/Unaligned | 177,326 | 1.9% | 0 |
Freedom Party | 111,995 | 1.2% | 0 |
Totals | 9,328,271 | 100.0% | 61 |
New Luthoria
Region of New Luthoria | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Vote % | Deputies |
Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance | 1,568,354 | 52.6% | 10 |
Federal Humanist Party | 1,328,507 | 44.6% | 9 |
Digger's Society | 45,132 | 1.5% | 0 |
Freedom Party | 38,685 | 1.3% | 0 |
Totals | 2,980,678 | 100.0% | 19 |
Islas de la Libertad
Region of Islas de la Libertad | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Vote % | Deputies |
Federal Humanist Party | 920,772 | 50.1% | 6 |
Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance | 757,201 | 41.2% | 5 |
Independent/Unaligned | 94,466 | 5.1% | 1 |
Digger's Society | 42,271 | 2.3% | 0 |
Freedom Party | 22,054 | 1.2% | 0 |
Totals | 1,836,764 | 100.0% | 12 |
North Lyrica
Region of North Lyrica | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Vote % | Deputies |
Federal Humanist Party | 6,894,262 | 74.0% | 46 |
Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance | 2,008,393 | 21.6% | 13 |
Freedom Party | 217,557 | 2.3% | 1 |
Digger's Society | 194,656 | 2.1% | 1 |
Totals | 9,314,868 | 100.0% | 61 |
South Lyrica
Region of South Lyrica | |||
---|---|---|---|
Party | Votes | Vote % | Deputies |
Federal Humanist Party | 5,672,203 | 56.4% | 38 |
Social Democratic & Liberal Alliance | 3,701,012 | 36.8% | 24 |
Digger's Society | 150,856 | 1.5% | 0 |
Freedom Party | 120,685 | 1.2% | 0 |
Totals | 9,314,868 | 100.0% | 65 |