1692 Hurmu internment crisis: Difference between revisions
Continuator (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Continuator (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| image = | | image = | ||
| caption = | | caption = | ||
| date = | | date = 16.III.{{AN|1692}} – 20.VIII.{{AN|1692}} | ||
| place = [[Southern District]] ([[Hurmu]]) | | place = [[Southern District]] ([[Hurmu]]) | ||
| coordinates = | | coordinates = | ||
Revision as of 16:37, 16 January 2021
|
This article or section is a work in progress. The information below may be incomplete, outdated, or subject to change. |
| 1692 Hurmu internment crisis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part of Second Elwynnese Civil War | ||||||
|
||||||
| Belligerents | ||||||
 Hurmu
|  Elwynn and Amokolia
|  Raspur Pact
|
||||
| Units involved | ||||||
| 51st Ter Div
| AMEAHL
|
|||||
In early 1692 AN, the 51st Territorial Defence Division of the Union Defence Force, deployed in Hurmu as part of the Allied Reconstruction Mission in Hurmu, was amongst the Elwynnese forces to join the rebellion against the Court of the Princess. In accordance with international norms, the government of Hurmu was obliged to demand that the mutinous Elwynnese troops surrender their arms and accept internment for the duration of hostilities in their home country. The refusal of the 51st Division, having now transferred its allegiance to the Self-Defence Forces of Elwynn and Amokolia, to accede to this demand precipitated a diplomatic crisis that threatened the neutrality, security, and territorial integrity of the newly independent Hurmu nation.
