Administrative Coordination Office

Administrative Coordination Office

Bureau de Coordination Administrative (Alexandrian) Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa (Martino) Kamachiq Taqay Wasi (Wechua)
Formed	VI.1741 AN
Dissolved	3.II.1745 AN
Jurisdiction	Nouvelle Alexandrie
Headquarters	Government House, Cárdenas
Employees	2,120 (as of dissolution)
Annual budget	285 million écus (1745 AN)
Director	Isabel Vásquez (final director)
Parent agency	Council of State
Successor agency	Department of Administrative Coordination and Efficiency

The Administrative Coordination Office (ACO; Alexandrian: Bureau de Coordination Administrative; Martino: Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa; Wechua: Kamachiq Taqay Wasi) was a federal agency of Nouvelle Alexandrie that operated from VI.1741 AN to 3.II.1745 AN. Created initially in response to widespread administrative challenges within the Juan Pablo Jimenez administration, the agency evolved into the central implementing authority for major governance reform initiatives before being dissolved and replaced by the Department of Administrative Coordination and Efficiency under the Government Efficiency Reorganization Act, 1745.

History

The Administrative Coordination Office was established by executive order on 20.VI.1741 AN as part of Premier Juan Pablo Jimenez's emergency reforms to address significant administrative dysfunction within his government. The creation of the agency came after leaked documents revealed extensive coordination problems, staffing shortages, and operational inefficiencies across federal departments.

Initially focused on immediate administrative stabilization, the ACO's mandate was significantly expanded in II.1742 AN through the Government Coordination Enhancement Act, 1742, which transformed the agency from a temporary crisis management body into a permanent institution with broad authority to implement structural reforms. This transformation reflected growing recognition of the need for systematic governance modernization beyond the immediate challenges that had prompted the agency's creation.

Under the leadership of Director Isabel Vásquez, the ACO became the driving force behind the Jimenez administration's ambitious governance reform agenda. The agency's staff grew from its initial 450 employees to approximately 2,120 by the time of its dissolution, reflecting its expanded responsibilities and the implementation of major reform initiatives.

Final years and dissolution

Following Premier Jimenez's decisive electoral victory in 1744, the government began planning a comprehensive reorganization of administrative functions. The ACO's success in implementing reforms and improving government efficiency had demonstrated the value of centralized coordination, but also highlighted the need for a more permanent institutional structure with enhanced authority and resources.

In late 1744 AN, the Council of State began developing proposals for elevating the ACO's functions to full departmental status. This process culminated in the passage of the Government Efficiency Reorganization Act, 1745 on 3.II.1745 AN, which formally dissolved the Administrative Coordination Office and established the Department of Administrative Coordination and Efficiency (DACE) as a new Council of State-level department.

Director Vásquez oversaw the transition process, ensuring continuity of operations and the transfer of all ACO personnel, resources, and ongoing initiatives to the new department. The dissolution ceremony on 3.II.1745 AN was attended by Premier Jimenez, who praised the ACO's "transformative impact on the quality and effectiveness of federal governance."

Functions and powers

During its operational period, the Administrative Coordination Office possessed broad authority to:

• Establish and enforce standardized administrative procedures across federal departments;
• Review and approve departmental organizational structures;
• Coordinate interdepartmental activities and communications;
• Monitor administrative performance and compliance;
• Oversee senior-level recruitment and appointments;
• Issue binding administrative directives;
• Conduct administrative audits and investigations.

Structure and organization

The ACO operated as an independent agency within the Council of State, with its Director reporting directly to the President of the Government. Following the ACO Organizational Reform Act, 1743, the agency was structured around six specialized directorates.

The Interdepartmental Coordination Directorate facilitated communication and collaboration between federal departments through digital coordination platforms. The Administrative Standards Directorate developed standardized procedures and protocols across the federal administration.

The Digital Transformation Directorate, established in IV.1742 AN, led the implementation of the Digital Nouvelle Alexandrie Initiative. The Regional Integration Directorate, formed in VIII.1742 AN, coordinated the harmonization of federal and regional administrative systems.

The Civil Service Excellence Directorate, created in I.1743 AN, oversaw the implementation of civil service reforms, including training programs, performance management systems, and career development pathways. The Strategic Foresight Directorate, established in III.1744 AN, developed long-term planning capabilities and coordinated horizon scanning activities across the government.

The agency maintained coordination offices in all federal departments and established comprehensive regional centers in all twelve Regions of the Federation.

Major initiatives

During its existence, the ACO successfully implemented several transformative governance reforms:

Digital governance framework

The ACO developed and implemented a comprehensive digital transformation strategy that modernized government service delivery and internal operations. This included the creation of unified citizen service portals, standardized digital workflows, and enhanced cybersecurity protocols.

Regional integration model

The agency coordinated efforts to harmonize federal and regional administrative systems while respecting regional autonomy, creating the framework for improved intergovernmental cooperation that continues under DACE.

Civil service modernization

The ACO oversaw comprehensive reforms to recruitment, training, and performance management within the federal civil service, establishing the foundation for a more professional and effective public administration.

Strategic foresight capabilities

The agency developed systematic approaches to long-term planning and horizon scanning, enabling the government to better anticipate and respond to emerging challenges.

Legacy and impact

The ACO's most significant achievement was demonstrating that systematic administrative reform could dramatically improve government effectiveness without requiring major legislative changes. By the time of its dissolution, the agency had:

• Reduced permit processing times by 73% across all federal departments
• Increased digital service adoption to 78% of all government transactions
• Achieved 72% public satisfaction with government services, the highest level since measurement began
• Generated an estimated NAX€31.3 billion in economic benefits through reduced bureaucratic friction
• Established a professional civil service culture focused on problem-solving rather than procedural compliance

These achievements provided the foundation for the enhanced mandate and resources granted to its successor, the Department of Administrative Coordination and Efficiency.

Oversight

Throughout its existence, the ACO was subject to oversight from the Public Administration Committee of the Federal Assembly. The committee conducted regular hearings on the agency's activities and reviewed its performance reports. The Director was required to appear before the committee quarterly and provide monthly written updates on the agency's progress.

Challenges and criticisms

Despite its achievements, the ACO faced criticism from some quarters during its operational period. Regional authorities in North Lyrica and the Isles of Caputia expressed concerns about perceived encroachment on regional autonomy, particularly regarding the standardization of administrative processes. The ACO responded by enhancing its consultative mechanisms and emphasizing the principle of "harmonization without homogenization."

Opposition parties, particularly the Alliance for a Just Nouvelle Alexandrie, questioned the concentration of authority within the agency, arguing for stronger parliamentary oversight. The Federal Assembly's Public Administration Committee conducted comprehensive reviews of the ACO's operations in IV.1743 AN and II.1744 AN, recommending enhanced transparency measures that the agency implemented.

Resource constraints remained a concern as the agency's mandate continued to expand, ultimately contributing to the decision to elevate its functions to full departmental status with enhanced resources and authority.

See also

• Department of Administrative Coordination and Efficiency
• Council of State of Nouvelle Alexandrie
• Federal Civil Service System
• Juan Pablo Jimenez
• Government Efficiency Reorganization Act, 1745