2nd National Assembly of Klaasiya elections: Difference between revisions
Constancia (talk | contribs) (Created page with "The 1699 elections for the 2nd National Assembly of Klaasiya were the second elections in the demesne since the new Constitution. The election was...") |
Constancia (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox legislative election | |||
| election_name = 2nd National Assembly of Klaasiya election | |||
| country = Natopia | |||
| previous_election = [[1st National Assembly of Klaasiya elections|''Previous'']] | |||
| next_election = [[3rd National Assembly of Klaasiya elections|''Next'']] | |||
| election_date = 5 Sonnuber {{AN year|1699}} | |||
| seats_for_election = All 100 seats in the [[National Assembly (Klaasiya)|National Assembly of Klaasiya]] | |||
| majority_seats = 51 | |||
| first_election = no | |||
| opinion_polls = | |||
| ongoing = <!-- or future --> | |||
| results_sec = Results summary | |||
| turnout = | |||
<!-- FJBP --> | |||
| party1= Free Juice and Bagels Party | |||
| colour1 = #80A000 | |||
| leader1 = [[Glen Penhela]] | |||
| percentage1 = 34.3 | |||
| seats1 = 34 | |||
| last_election1 = 40 | |||
| party2 = Nationalist & Humanist Party | |||
| colour2 = #141313 | |||
| leader2 = [[Greg Prown]] | |||
| percentage2 = 33.1 | |||
| seats2 = 33 | |||
| last_election2 = 19 | |||
<!-- UDM -->| party3 = Democratic Party | |||
| colour3 = #0000FF | |||
| leader3 = [[Lily Inkwell]] | |||
| percentage3 = 21.2 | |||
| seats3 = 21 | |||
| last_election3 = 28 | |||
<!-- WPU -->| party4 = Tapferite Supremacist Party | |||
| colour4 = #00FF00 | |||
| leader4 = [[Viktor Falkner]] | |||
| percentage4 = 5.4 | |||
| seats4 = 4 | |||
| last_election4 = 6 | |||
<!-- DPK -->| party5 = Workers' Parties United | |||
| colour5 = #FF0000 | |||
| leader5 = [[Nezava Ospen]] | |||
| percentage5 = 4.3 | |||
| last_election5 = 6 | |||
| party6 = Independents | |||
| colour6 = #777777 | |||
| leader6 = | |||
| percentage6 = 1.8 | |||
| seats6 = 2 | |||
| last_election6 = 1 | |||
<!-- Bottom -->| map = 2nd National Assembly seats.svg | |||
| map_caption = {{Unbulleted list|Composition of the 2nd National Assembly|{{legend|#80A000|FJBP: 34 seats}}|{{legend|#141313|NAH: 33 seats}}|{{legend|#0000FF|DP: 21 seats}}|{{legend|#00FF00|TSP: 5 seats}}|{{legend|#FF0000|WPU: 4 seats}}|{{legend|#777777|I: 2 seats}}}} | |||
| title = Chair of the National Assembly | |||
| before_election = Glen Penhela | |||
| before_party = FJBP | |||
| before_image = | |||
| after_election = Glen Penhela | |||
| after_party = FJBP | |||
| after_image = | |||
}} | |||
The 1699 elections for the 2nd National Assembly of Klaasiya were the second elections in the demesne since the new [[Constitution of Klaasiya|Constitution]]. The election was held on 5 Sonnuber {{AN|1699}}, exactly 6 years after the [[1st National Assembly of Klaasiya elections|previous election]]. | The 1699 elections for the 2nd National Assembly of Klaasiya were the second elections in the demesne since the new [[Constitution of Klaasiya|Constitution]]. The election was held on 5 Sonnuber {{AN|1699}}, exactly 6 years after the [[1st National Assembly of Klaasiya elections|previous election]]. | ||
== Election campaign == | ==Election campaign== | ||
The 1699 campaign was conducted in sharp contrast to the contentions race six years prior. The FJBP-DP coalution, established following the previous election, enjoyed relative support among the population. In particular, the FJBP Chair of the Assembly, [[Glen Penhela]] was a popular figure among both coalution partners, in addition to their supporters. Throughout the campaign, the FJBP and the DP maintained a united front, with few infighthings between individual members. Despite running separate campaigns, the media largely reported news under the assumption that the coalition will continue in government, should it maintain its majority. | The 1699 campaign was conducted in sharp contrast to the contentions race six years prior. The FJBP-DP coalution, established following the previous election, enjoyed relative support among the population. In particular, the FJBP Chair of the Assembly, [[Glen Penhela]] was a popular figure among both coalution partners, in addition to their supporters. Throughout the campaign, the FJBP and the DP maintained a united front, with few infighthings between individual members. Despite running separate campaigns, the media largely reported news under the assumption that the coalition will continue in government, should it maintain its majority. | ||
Line 7: | Line 68: | ||
During a TV debate of party leaders on 1 Sonnuber, 4 days before the election, NHP leader Greg Prown sharply criticised Glen Penhela for reducing the number of sessions after the election of the FJBP President in 1694 and claimed "checks and balances" had been replaced with rubber-stamping executive action. Penhela defended his party's record in covernment, claiming that "the Nationalists have changed their colours in opposition to attain power. So much of their conviction". | During a TV debate of party leaders on 1 Sonnuber, 4 days before the election, NHP leader Greg Prown sharply criticised Glen Penhela for reducing the number of sessions after the election of the FJBP President in 1694 and claimed "checks and balances" had been replaced with rubber-stamping executive action. Penhela defended his party's record in covernment, claiming that "the Nationalists have changed their colours in opposition to attain power. So much of their conviction". | ||
==Opinion polling== | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
|+ | |||
!Date | |||
!Pollster | |||
!Sample | |||
size | |||
!WPU | |||
!DP | |||
!FJBP | |||
!N&H | |||
!TSP | |||
!Others | |||
!Lead | |||
! | |||
|- | |||
|3-4 Novaber | |||
|National Association of Pollsters | |||
|1,094 | |||
|9.4% | |||
|22.4% | |||
|36.1% | |||
|24.6% | |||
|4.0% | |||
|3.5% | |||
|'''11.5%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|10-12 Novaber | |||
|National Association of Pollsters | |||
|998 | |||
|10.3% | |||
|20.7% | |||
|34.0% | |||
|26.1% | |||
|4.8% | |||
|4.1% | |||
|'''7.9%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|9-13 Novaber | |||
|The New Reporter Poll | |||
|1,040 | |||
|9.1% | |||
|23.5% | |||
|31.6% | |||
|23.3% | |||
|6.1% | |||
|6.4% | |||
|'''8.1%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|1-3 Liebluary | |||
|National Association of Pollsters | |||
|1,094 | |||
|8.1% | |||
|19.6% | |||
|35.1% | |||
|25.5% | |||
|7.6% | |||
|4.1% | |||
|'''9.6%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|15-17 Liebluary | |||
|National Association of Pollsters | |||
|1,094 | |||
|7.6% | |||
|20.7% | |||
|32.1% | |||
|27.8% | |||
|5.1% | |||
|6.7% | |||
|'''4.3%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|22-23 Liebluary | |||
|The New Reporter Poll | |||
|1,040 | |||
|8.1% | |||
|18.5% | |||
|31.4% | |||
|30.2% | |||
|6.5% | |||
|5.3% | |||
|'''1.2%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|7-8 Grunil | |||
|National Association of Pollsters | |||
|998 | |||
|11.3% | |||
|20.1% | |||
|30.5% | |||
|31.1% | |||
|4.1% | |||
|2.9% | |||
|'''0.6%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#141313" | | |||
|- | |||
|10-12 Grunil | |||
|The New Reporter Poll | |||
|1,040 | |||
|9.7% | |||
|19.4% | |||
|31.3% | |||
|30.6% | |||
|3.7% | |||
|5.3% | |||
|'''0.7%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|20-21 Grunil | |||
|The New Reporter Poll | |||
|1,040 | |||
|7.1% | |||
|18.4% | |||
|29.4% | |||
|31.8% | |||
|6.6% | |||
|6.7% | |||
|'''2.4%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#141313" | | |||
|- | |||
|4-5 Regnuary | |||
|National Association of Pollsters | |||
|1,094 | |||
|6.4% | |||
|16.9% | |||
|31.5% | |||
|32.0% | |||
|7.0% | |||
|6.2% | |||
|'''0.5%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#141313" | | |||
|- | |||
|10-12 Regnuary | |||
|The New Reporter Poll | |||
|1,040 | |||
|5.2% | |||
|17.5% | |||
|33.9% | |||
|31.7% | |||
|6.1% | |||
|5.6% | |||
|'''2.2%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|19-20 Regnuary | |||
|National Association of Pollsters | |||
|1,094 | |||
|4.7% | |||
|19.3% | |||
|34.6% | |||
|30.3% | |||
|4.3% | |||
|6.8% | |||
|'''4.3%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|8-9 Blumuar | |||
|National Association of Pollsters | |||
|998 | |||
|3.5% | |||
|21.8% | |||
|35.1% | |||
|31.1% | |||
|5.0% | |||
|3.5% | |||
|'''4.0%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|18-19 Blumuar | |||
|The New Reporter Poll | |||
|1,040 | |||
|3.1% | |||
|23.1% | |||
|34.9% | |||
|30.2% | |||
|4.3% | |||
|4.4% | |||
|'''4.7%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|5 Sonnuber | |||
EXIT POLL | |||
|National Association of Pollsters | |||
|1,094 | |||
|2.7% | |||
|23.3% | |||
|38.4% | |||
|31.7% | |||
|3.2% | |||
|0.7% | |||
|'''6.7%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
|5 Sonnuber | |||
EXIT POLL | |||
|The New Reporter Poll | |||
|1,040 | |||
|2.9% | |||
|21.8% | |||
|37.4% | |||
|32.2% | |||
|3.9% | |||
|1.8% | |||
|'''5.2%''' | |||
| bgcolor="#80A000" | | |||
|- | |||
!Result | |||
! | |||
! | |||
|4.2% | |||
|21.2% | |||
|34.3% | |||
|33.1% | |||
|5.4% | |||
|1.8% | |||
|'''1.2%''' | |||
! | |||
|} |
Revision as of 21:05, 1 December 2021
![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 100 seats in the National Assembly of Klaasiya 51 seats needed for a majority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This lists parties that won seats. See the complete results below. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2nd National Assembly seats.svg
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The 1699 elections for the 2nd National Assembly of Klaasiya were the second elections in the demesne since the new Constitution. The election was held on 5 Sonnuber 1699 AN, exactly 6 years after the previous election.
Election campaign
The 1699 campaign was conducted in sharp contrast to the contentions race six years prior. The FJBP-DP coalution, established following the previous election, enjoyed relative support among the population. In particular, the FJBP Chair of the Assembly, Glen Penhela was a popular figure among both coalution partners, in addition to their supporters. Throughout the campaign, the FJBP and the DP maintained a united front, with few infighthings between individual members. Despite running separate campaigns, the media largely reported news under the assumption that the coalition will continue in government, should it maintain its majority.
The Nationalist & Humanist Party's campaign also saw significant differences in its execution compared to the loss of 1693. Under the new and reformed leadership of Greg Prown, the party positioned itself as the "one and only chance of a new government" and adopted popular centrist policies. In particular, it focused heavily on winning over socially liberal and fiscally conservative youngesters in traditionally Democratic strongholds, such as Borders Bay. Under Prown, the party's election slogan became "diversified in our backgrounds, united in our convictions".
During a TV debate of party leaders on 1 Sonnuber, 4 days before the election, NHP leader Greg Prown sharply criticised Glen Penhela for reducing the number of sessions after the election of the FJBP President in 1694 and claimed "checks and balances" had been replaced with rubber-stamping executive action. Penhela defended his party's record in covernment, claiming that "the Nationalists have changed their colours in opposition to attain power. So much of their conviction".
Opinion polling
Date | Pollster | Sample
size |
WPU | DP | FJBP | N&H | TSP | Others | Lead | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-4 Novaber | National Association of Pollsters | 1,094 | 9.4% | 22.4% | 36.1% | 24.6% | 4.0% | 3.5% | 11.5% | |
10-12 Novaber | National Association of Pollsters | 998 | 10.3% | 20.7% | 34.0% | 26.1% | 4.8% | 4.1% | 7.9% | |
9-13 Novaber | The New Reporter Poll | 1,040 | 9.1% | 23.5% | 31.6% | 23.3% | 6.1% | 6.4% | 8.1% | |
1-3 Liebluary | National Association of Pollsters | 1,094 | 8.1% | 19.6% | 35.1% | 25.5% | 7.6% | 4.1% | 9.6% | |
15-17 Liebluary | National Association of Pollsters | 1,094 | 7.6% | 20.7% | 32.1% | 27.8% | 5.1% | 6.7% | 4.3% | |
22-23 Liebluary | The New Reporter Poll | 1,040 | 8.1% | 18.5% | 31.4% | 30.2% | 6.5% | 5.3% | 1.2% | |
7-8 Grunil | National Association of Pollsters | 998 | 11.3% | 20.1% | 30.5% | 31.1% | 4.1% | 2.9% | 0.6% | |
10-12 Grunil | The New Reporter Poll | 1,040 | 9.7% | 19.4% | 31.3% | 30.6% | 3.7% | 5.3% | 0.7% | |
20-21 Grunil | The New Reporter Poll | 1,040 | 7.1% | 18.4% | 29.4% | 31.8% | 6.6% | 6.7% | 2.4% | |
4-5 Regnuary | National Association of Pollsters | 1,094 | 6.4% | 16.9% | 31.5% | 32.0% | 7.0% | 6.2% | 0.5% | |
10-12 Regnuary | The New Reporter Poll | 1,040 | 5.2% | 17.5% | 33.9% | 31.7% | 6.1% | 5.6% | 2.2% | |
19-20 Regnuary | National Association of Pollsters | 1,094 | 4.7% | 19.3% | 34.6% | 30.3% | 4.3% | 6.8% | 4.3% | |
8-9 Blumuar | National Association of Pollsters | 998 | 3.5% | 21.8% | 35.1% | 31.1% | 5.0% | 3.5% | 4.0% | |
18-19 Blumuar | The New Reporter Poll | 1,040 | 3.1% | 23.1% | 34.9% | 30.2% | 4.3% | 4.4% | 4.7% | |
5 Sonnuber
EXIT POLL |
National Association of Pollsters | 1,094 | 2.7% | 23.3% | 38.4% | 31.7% | 3.2% | 0.7% | 6.7% | |
5 Sonnuber
EXIT POLL |
The New Reporter Poll | 1,040 | 2.9% | 21.8% | 37.4% | 32.2% | 3.9% | 1.8% | 5.2% | |
Result | 4.2% | 21.2% | 34.3% | 33.1% | 5.4% | 1.8% | 1.2% |