This is an article about the Imperial State of Constancia. Do you want to know more?

Astérapolis Bridge-Tunnel: Difference between revisions

From MicrasWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


In {{AN|1693}}, the [[Thraci Confederation|Thraci]] expansion led to relations with the rest of the [[Pan-Euran Highway]] participants souring, dashing the hopes of securing the initial route which connected through the [[Thraci Confederation]]. During [[Fontainebleau Accords|diplomatic talks in Fontainebleau]], [[Alduria]], the route of the [[Pan-Euran Highway]] was revised to pass through the [[Southern Aldurian Riviera]] and enter [[Constancia]] north of [[Arak]]. In {{AN|1684}}, soon after announcing the new capital, [[Petropolis]], the Autokrator of Constancia appointed a consortium, the Astérapolis Bridge-Tunnel Consortium, to design and build the bridge-tunnel system, with heavy financial and technical support from [[Nouvelle Alexandrie]] and private firms.
In {{AN|1693}}, the [[Thraci Confederation|Thraci]] expansion led to relations with the rest of the [[Pan-Euran Highway]] participants souring, dashing the hopes of securing the initial route which connected through the [[Thraci Confederation]]. During [[Fontainebleau Accords|diplomatic talks in Fontainebleau]], [[Alduria]], the route of the [[Pan-Euran Highway]] was revised to pass through the [[Southern Aldurian Riviera]] and enter [[Constancia]] north of [[Arak]]. In {{AN|1684}}, soon after announcing the new capital, [[Petropolis]], the Autokrator of Constancia appointed a consortium, the Astérapolis Bridge-Tunnel Consortium, to design and build the bridge-tunnel system, with heavy financial and technical support from [[Nouvelle Alexandrie]] and private firms.
==Design==
<gallery>
File:TunnelCrossSection1.png|Cross-section of tunnel design ({{AN|1694}}).
</gallery>


==Criticisms==
==Criticisms==

Revision as of 01:13, 25 March 2021

Proposed route of the Asterapolis Bridge-Tunnel. (1694 AN)

The Astérapolis Bridge-Tunnel is a proposed megaproject as part of the Pan-Euran Highway in Constancia that aims to build a 312.65 km bridge-tunnel system that consists of three cable-stayed bridges, an undersea tunnel, and several artificial islands that will cross the Gulf of Aqaba, connecting the city of Astérapolis, on the island of Idolgi.

The proposed bridge-tunnel project is designed to provide uninterrupted freeway traffic flow, as opposed to the current configuration where a system of ferries and transports constantly ferried freight and passengers back and forth between Astérapolis and the rest of the country. The estimate cost of the project remains undisclosed, but it is general estimated to be €107.16 billion New Alexandrian écu.

First proposed in 1691 AN, the project met with prominent opposition by the owner of one of the largest ferry companies in Astérapolis, Thanasis Agnakos of Agnakos Transport, who believed competition from a publicly owned bridge would reduce revenue for the industry. The project was shelved as Agnakos continued to pursue legal recourse in the Constancian courts, even filing lawsuits in Nouvelle Alexandrie as well, as the project had gained significant investor support from that country.

In 1693 AN, the Thraci expansion led to relations with the rest of the Pan-Euran Highway participants souring, dashing the hopes of securing the initial route which connected through the Thraci Confederation. During diplomatic talks in Fontainebleau, Alduria, the route of the Pan-Euran Highway was revised to pass through the Southern Aldurian Riviera and enter Constancia north of Arak. In 1684 AN, soon after announcing the new capital, Petropolis, the Autokrator of Constancia appointed a consortium, the Astérapolis Bridge-Tunnel Consortium, to design and build the bridge-tunnel system, with heavy financial and technical support from Nouvelle Alexandrie and private firms.

Design

Criticisms

Thanasis Agnakos

White elephant project

Critics in Constancia and in Nouvelle Alexandrie have attacked the estimated cost of the project as too much, that it is a waste of taxpayers’ money. To support their arguments, they point to the early designs of the bridge-tunnel system, which proposes to prescribe restrictive criteria for drivers to use the bridge with their own vehicle.

See also