1744 UPR Primaries
 | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
14 Delegation Contest wins | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opinion polls | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
File:1744 UPR presidential primaries imagemap.png First place by pledged delegate allocation | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
The UPR presidential primaries will take place within all Florian states, Northcliff Federal District, and territories in 1744. These elections will select the delegates to be sent to the United Republican National Convention. Vice President Ronald Trueman Jr. is expected to be chosen as Presidential nominee.
A total of 5 major candidates entered the race but three withdrew before the primaries commenced.
Timeline
Debates
FT
The first debate for the primaries was hosted by the news television network, FT in 1741.6 AN. Expected to be contested by 5 candidates it eventually was only debated by two, those candidates being Ronald Trueman Jr. and Gerald Tucker.
The debate focused on issues relating to the economy, abortion, and foreign policy. Trueman's family and his father's ill-fated term as President took up a portion of the debate with Tucker questioning whether would it be appropriate for the party to nominate someone whose family relatives have been criminally convicted. Tucker said that Trueman was "unfit" to be president despite success as VP. The candidates differed on the issue of abortion, with Trueman supporting state choice and Tucker supporting a national ban. Both candidates had varying opinions on the economy and foreign policy but Trueman said the continuation of Floria First! policies was the way forward.
Despite criticism of his family ties, Trueman Jr. was considered a comfortable winner against the Governor of Southland.
FBC
In the UPR Primary debate broadcast on FBC between Ronald Trueman Junior and Gerald Tucker, both candidates presented strong but opposing views on key issues facing Floria. Trueman, with his right-wing populist ideology, emphasised reducing government intervention, advocating for a market-driven approach to climate change, privatised healthcare, and tax cuts to spur business growth. He argued that deregulation and empowering businesses would be the key to Floria's prosperity. In contrast, Tucker, a centrist Republican, focused on pragmatic, balanced solutions. He acknowledged the threat of climate change and supported green technologies, but wanted to ensure that economic stability was not sacrificed. Tucker also advocated for a hybrid healthcare system and emphasized investing in infrastructure and education to create long-term economic growth.
While Trueman was more radical in his stance, calling for drastic cuts in government influence, Tucker’s approach was more measured, focusing on practical, common-sense reforms that aimed to bring both sides of the political spectrum together.
Trueman's bold rhetoric resonated with those who were already aligned with his populist stance and wanted drastic change. However, Tucker’s centrist approach, emphasizing cooperation and balanced solutions, appealed to voters seeking moderation and compromise in addressing Floria's challenges.
