Talk:LGBT rights in Krasnocoria

From MicrasWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

"Transsexual individuals in the lands would be recommended to seek psychological treatment, and mandated to do so if they cross-dress or attempt to act as women in public."

what about trans men? --User:Octavius 12:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Glad I wasn't the only one to notice this. Maybe trans men have to continue to wear "women's" clothes but cannot "act" as a woman whilst doing so. Craitman (talk) 14:20, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Fair enough, thank you for spotting this, I will fix it accordingly. Nedland (talk) 15:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

"The state's current intellectual position is that bisexualism does not exist, and transsexualism is a mental illness which should be treated with medication and therapy accordingly. "

so homosexuality does exist and bisexuality doesn't exist? Also, what is the position of the medical community of Krasnocoria on how to "treat" trans people? --User:Octavius 12:45, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Yes, this is true; bisexualism is not considered to exist. The position of the medical community is yet to be decided at this time. Nedland (talk) 15:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

I have to point out that template of this article was LGBT rights in Nedland, and some things aren't adapted to Krasnocorian version yet, as Nedland was a bit lazy last night. Kingdomcoria (talk) 14:27, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

I don't know about before, but Anticans in Krasnocoria's borders are now predominately non-Western-aligned Catholic, Protestant and Muslim now, having been converted to these views while living in the green after the arrival of Corians and Krasnarusyn groups. Those that are not (about 30% of the Antican population in the 2017 census) have still been significantly culturally affected by these large shifts, which is why the Anticans today are not pro-gay. Nedland (talk) 18:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

If they've changed that much, why retain the ethnic identity without any sort of revision? Also, it's pretty easy to be pro-human rights and religious simultaneously. --User:Octavius 21:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Many did not retain their identity; modern-day Corians and Slovedks are primarily descended from Anticans. Those Anticans that did not culturally convert were still significantly influenced over time by the ruling opinion, which was completely dominant over any previous views that the old Anticans may have had. I originally kept Anticans as a separate group because it doesn't make much sense when people totally wipe away an entire ethnic group from a previous nation and never explain what happened to them (it's not proper roleplay in my opinion), but that doesn't mean that their beliefs couldn't have changed. Also, it is clearly a debate whether gay marriage is a human rights issue. Nedland (talk) 00:46, 18 September 2019 (UTC)