Special Tribunal of 1739
This article or section is a work in progress. The information below may be incomplete, outdated, or subject to change. |
Special Tribunal of 1739 | |
Abbreviation | ST-1739 (TS-1739/QHTT-1739) |
---|---|
Motto | "Justice Under Law" |
Formation | 1.IV.1739 AN |
Extinction | 15.VIII.1739 AN |
Type | Special Military Tribunal |
Legal status | Ad hoc judicial body |
Purpose/focus | Trial of Spring Crisis coup participants |
Headquarters | Palace of Justice, Cárdenas |
Location | Nouvelle Alexandrie |
Region served | Nouvelle Alexandrie |
Membership | 9 judges |
Official languages | Alexandrian, Wechua, Martino, Istvanistani |
Presiding Judge | Roberto Mendoza |
Chief Prosecutor | Maria Elena Sotomayor |
Chief Defense Counsel | Juan Carlos Vega |
Tribunal Secretary | Isabella Riquelme |
Key people |
|
Main organ |
|
Parent organization | High Court of Justice of Nouvelle Alexandrie |
Affiliations | |
Budget | NAX€ 58 million |
Staff | 156 |
Remarks | Established under the Emergency Powers Act, 1739 |
The Special Tribunal of 1739 (Alexandrian: Tribunal Spécial de 1739, Martino: Tribunal Especial de 1739, Wechua: Qhapaq Hatun Taripa Tantanakuy-1739) was an ad hoc judicial body established to try participants in the Spring Crisis of 1739 coup attempt in Nouvelle Alexandrie. Operating from IV.1739 AN to VIII.1739 AN, the tribunal conducted trials of 232 defendants, including military officers and civilian conspirators, resulting in 187 convictions.
The tribunal was notable for its transparency, public proceedings, and strict adherence to due process despite the extraordinary circumstances. Its proceedings were broadcast on national television and extensively documented, helping restore public confidence in the justice system and demonstrating the government's commitment to constitutional order.
Background
Following the defeat of the coup attempt and initial investigations by the National Investigation Commission, the Emergency Powers Act, 1739 authorized the creation of a special tribunal to try those involved. The tribunal was deliberately structured to include both civilian and military judges, ensuring expertise in both constitutional and military law.
Structure and Organization
Composition
Prosecution Teams
Defense Services
Proceedings
Major Cases
Legal Standards
Key Decisions
Precedent-Setting Rulings
Sentencing Principles
Criticism
Archive
See also
- Spring Crisis of 1739
- National Investigation Commission
- Military Reform Commission
- Emergency Powers Act, 1739