Talk:Babkha: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Over-pedantic much? | Over-pedantic much? | ||
Nah, just concerned with facts. Sorry if that distresses you. | |||
Revision as of 20:37, 13 February 2011
Hey Taurusrex/ Your Radiance- excellent work as always but I feel I should point out that there is a problem with the section on Kelestan. You've written that Baatharz is the northernmost region of Babkha and is presently occupied by Antica, Ashkenatza, and Babkha.
Baatharz is not 'occupied' by Antica and Ashkenatza in the manner a reader of this article would think- it's not marked as occupied territory by the MCS and cannot therefore be called such in MicrasWiki. I hasten to add that this isn't to do with a pro-Ashkenatzi bias on my part, simply a matter of terminology which is misleading and presents an inaccurate view of Euran politics as they stand today.
Over-pedantic much?
Nah, just concerned with facts. Sorry if that distresses you.
