Florian Republic constitutional referendum, 1684: Difference between revisions
From MicrasWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|'''54%''' | |bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|'''54%''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=left |No | |||
|bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|30,868,428 | |bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|30,868,428 | ||
|bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|46% | |bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|46% | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|bgcolor=eeeeee align=right|67,105,279 | |bgcolor=eeeeee align=right|67,105,279 | ||
|bgcolor=eeeeee align=right|100% | |bgcolor=eeeeee align=right|100% | ||
| | |- | ||
|align="center" colspan="5" bgcolor=f9f9f9 | | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
|align="center" colspan="5" bgcolor=f9f9f9 |''Which new name should the nation adopt?'' | |align="center" colspan="5" bgcolor=f9f9f9 |''Which new name should the nation adopt?'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 52: | Line 44: | ||
|bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|'''71%''' | |bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|'''71%''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=left |United States of Apollonia | |||
|bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|20,672,725 | |bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|20,672,725 | ||
|bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|29% | |bgcolor=f9f9f9 align=right|29% | ||
| Line 68: | Line 60: | ||
|bgcolor=eeeeee align=right|100% | |bgcolor=eeeeee align=right|100% | ||
|} | |} | ||
A referendum was held in the [[Florian Republic]] in {{AN Year|1684}}, with voters asked whether the nation should adopt a new name. It was called by [[President of the Confederate States of Floria|President]] [[Morgan Sharp]] following a bill being passed in the [[Florian Congress]]. The referendum was held in two parts, the first being a yes/no question as to whether a name change should occur, and the second being a choice of two name options. | |||
==Campaign== | |||
Both the [[United National Party of the Republic|UNPR]] and [[Imperial Democratic Party of the Florian Republic|IDPFR]] formed the main campaign group in favour of a name change, stating that the current name was an unfortunate reminder of the nation's {{Tooltip|chequered past|pun intended}} and that the recent policy of continuous, rapid expansion should signal a new era for the Florian people, with a name change being essential to building a successful future for the nation. | |||
The [[Labour Party (Floria)|Labour Party]] led the main opposition campaign, on the platform that the country should honour its history. | |||
==Administration== | |||
==Referendum questions== | |||
==International reactions== | ==International reactions== | ||
[[Category:Florian Republic]] | [[Category:Florian Republic]] | ||
[[Category:Elections]] | [[Category:Elections]] | ||
Revision as of 14:17, 2 May 2020
| Should the Florian Republic change its official name? | ||||
| Results | ||||
| Votes | % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 36,236,834 | 54% | ||
| No | 30,868,428 | 46% | ||
| Valid votes | 58,381,593 | 87% | ||
| Invalid votes | 8,723,686 | 13% | ||
| Total votes | 67,105,279 | 100% | ||
| Which new name should the nation adopt? | ||||
| Results | ||||
| Votes | % | |||
| Confederate States of Floria | 50,612,535 | 71% | ||
| United States of Apollonia | 20,672,725 | 29% | ||
| Valid votes | 64,869,587 | 91% | ||
| Invalid votes | 6,415,673 | 9% | ||
| Total votes | 71,285,260 | 100% | ||
A referendum was held in the Florian Republic in Template:AN Year, with voters asked whether the nation should adopt a new name. It was called by President Morgan Sharp following a bill being passed in the Florian Congress. The referendum was held in two parts, the first being a yes/no question as to whether a name change should occur, and the second being a choice of two name options.
Campaign
Both the UNPR and IDPFR formed the main campaign group in favour of a name change, stating that the current name was an unfortunate reminder of the nation's chequered past and that the recent policy of continuous, rapid expansion should signal a new era for the Florian people, with a name change being essential to building a successful future for the nation.
The Labour Party led the main opposition campaign, on the platform that the country should honour its history.
