Talk:Antica: Difference between revisions

From MicrasWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Grade_G}}
This is so utterly poorly put together that it's hilarious.
This is so utterly poorly put together that it's hilarious.


This is out of date, I'd update, but I know nothing about Antica [[User:Babs|Babs]] 11:23, 4 July 2007 (MST)
This is out of date, I'd update, but I know nothing about Antica [[User:Babs|Babs]] 11:23, 4 July 2007 (MST)
Yeah,that's the problem
Why is it that I only ever see like 5 people a month doing any edits around here?
---Legiondude

Latest revision as of 01:35, 14 January 2016

100% This article is at 'Grade Gold' this means that it is informative and well structured. As it is to such a good standard this article may be considered to become featured.


This is so utterly poorly put together that it's hilarious.

This is out of date, I'd update, but I know nothing about Antica Babs 11:23, 4 July 2007 (MST)

Yeah,that's the problem

Why is it that I only ever see like 5 people a month doing any edits around here?

---Legiondude