|
|
(38 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''Nobility in [[Kurum Ash-Sharqia]]''' is a system om titled and untitled nobility, established in {{AN|1702}} and considerably expanded in {{AN|3000}}.
| | * [https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonkheer https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonkheer] |
| | |
| == History ==
| |
| With the enactment of the [[Laws of Kurum Ash-Sharqia/Royal House Act 1702|Royal House Act 1702]] the first noble titles were introduced, i.e. Prince and Princess of Kurum Ash-Sharqia, for the members of the [[House of Al-Lusirni|royal house]].
| |
| | |
| === Controversy ===
| |
| In {{AN|2999}} [[Grand Vizier of Kurum Ash-Sharqia|Grand Vizier]] xxxxx introduced a bill to [[Al-Majlis Al-Watani]] to create more titles, as well as a class of untitled nobility. The opposition questioned the Grand Vizier on this issue, after several leaks from the Grand Vizierate to the press. xxxxxxxx eventually explained that he was contacted by [[Crown Prince of Kurum Ash-Sharqia|Crown Prince]] [[Saif Ad-Din ibn Salah Ad-Din Al-Lusirni|Saif Ad-Din]] on the matter. The Prince wished a noble title for the future children of his sisters and his future brothers-in-law. Under the current Royal House Act, they would have no titles or noble status. His sisters, Princess [[Ihsane bint Salah Ad-Din Al-Lusirni|Ihsane]] and Princess * [[Imane bint Salah Ad-Din Al-Lusirni|Imane]] would soon reach maturity, hence his question.
| |
| | |
| When the Crown Prince's actions were revealed, both he and the Grand Vizier received a lot of criticism from the majority and the opposition. Most members of Al-Majlis Al-Watani said that the Crown Prince had overstepped the boundaries of constitutional monarchy, and that he should be reprimanded by the Grand Vizier in stead op being helped. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx took full responsibility and resigned on 2999-05, thus clearing the prince of all blame.
| |
| | |
| The actual subject of the bill, the creating of new noble titles, was nevertheless supported:
| |
| * by royalists and feminists alike, who believed that the female offspring of the [[Sultan of Kurum Ash-Sharqia|Sultan]] deserved a proper title as well
| |
| * by other politicians, business men and cultural figures, who believed it would improve the country's prestige
| |
| | |
| The bill was fiercely opposed by the [[Ulema Party]].
| |
| | |
| === Aftermath ===
| |
| After the resignation of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, the new Grand Vizier yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy, introduced the bill to Al-Majlis Al-Watani and send it to the [[Islamic Diwan of Kurum Ash-Sharqia|Islamic Diwan]] for advice. The Diwan gave a negative advice, arguing that it would go against the egalitarian spirit of islam to have a system of nobility. Due to this advice, support for the proposal diminished, but remained sufficient to pass it nevertheless.
| |
| | |
| == Titled nobility ==
| |
| | |
| == Untitled nobility ==
| |
| | |
| == Letters pattent ==
| |
| {| class="wikitable"
| |
| |+
| |
| !Date
| |
| !Ennoblement
| |
| !Letters patent
| |
| |-
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |-
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |-
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |}
| |