Houland [Modification]

Post by **Craitman** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 1:20 pm

pawelabrams wrote:I know... And it avoided Poland.....

don't blame it...

Post by **Pete** » Mon Apr 23, 2007 3:09 pm

You have no right to tell us to get on topic. If you try we'll lock it and ontinue our off topic discussion

Andreas the Wise · Post by **Andreas the Wise** » Tue Apr 24, 2007 5:11 am

Ooh, admin getting serious ...

My ancestors are all german ...

Swamp Candle · Post by **Swamp Candle** » Tue Apr 24, 2007 8:11 am

Colonel Vilhelm wrote:And I care for a few people on this forum.

do you care for me?

kingcairney · Post by **kingcairney** » Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:38 am

Does He Fuck

*excuse my french*
*french people excuse my german*
*german people excuse my jiberish*

Right Who Speek's Jiberish apart from Dr Spangle

Post by **Craitman** » Wed Apr 25, 2007 2:13 pm

well Jiberland for starters...

kingcairney · Post by **kingcairney** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:08 pm

Jiberland

Post by **Craitman** » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:52 pm

another quality comedy from the Lord of Humour...

Post by **dr-spangle** » Sat Apr 28, 2007 1:57 pm

well i belive i'm right in thi9nking that mods need no vote, it is for a nation to decide how they conduct their own land.

St. Fenix · Post by **St. Fenix** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:07 pm

no, we need to vote upon Modifications since there are a few reasons we may need to refuse them. (I.E. beacause of Map problems, beacause of us being swamped, and who knows what else It doesn't happen often. But we never know what may come up that we may need to do it for. Not to mention it keeps the Administration council operating at a good pace.)

Depending on how it is going though in the Council at the moment, I could see this passing.

But it is admittedly hard to refute a Modification for any reason, and although it is their business how they conduct the land, we must still vote upon it.

-St. Fenix

Post by **Pete** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:09 pm

we dont need to vote, we can refuse straight away if theres an obvious problem though

St. Fenix · Post by **St. Fenix** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:23 pm

well, do to the Controversy over this specific subject, I do believe that is it imperative that we should vote upon it. as we should all other modifications.

Its not like posting an extra "yes" or "no" will strain the system anyway.

-St. Fenix

Post by **dr-spangle** » Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:51 pm

it will strain my system, i'm close to meltdown, my brain's almiost setting fire i can't cope with life at the moment.

Andreas the Wise · Post by **Andreas the Wise** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 3:49 am

So is it approved or not?

Post by **dr-spangle** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:15 am

i thought modifications didn't need it.

Post by **Craitman** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:20 am

weren't we discussing whether modifications needed voted on before?
and Pete referred to his being the only one to receive a "no" vote...

Post by **dr-spangle** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 6:47 am

in the words of andy, yeah i know.

Post by **Craitman** » Mon Apr 30, 2007 9:25 am

in the words of Lou, "Are you sure you want that one...?"