the solar system

Post by **dr-spangle** » Sat Aug 19, 2006 3:14 pm

the solar system i found some old MAS posts that define the solare system round Micras:

Sun: Aton (type: G3)
1. Chrono (type: V)
2. Micras (moons: Atropos) (types: M)(size=1.0)
3. Inferia (type: A)
4. Indigo (moons: Plateau, Ivory*size=.1*) (type: W/M)
5. NI (moons: Fenrir, Lukedu)(type: J)
6. Yavin (types: J)
7. Superial (type: J)
8. Monkey (type: M)
9. Dyson (type: D)
10. Gottagobye (type: D)

Planet Types:

Gas Giant- J
Temperat(earthlike)- M
Frozen(pluto like)- D
Double PLanet- W
Venus like- V
Mars like- A

(Planet sizes based on Micron, Micron=1.0 10.0=10xMicron)

Star Types: O, B, A, F, G, K, M (O-M from Hottest to Coolest) (1-10 Hottest to coldest

Post by **dr-spangle** » Sat Aug 19, 2006 3:19 pm

it also appears bill designed a second planet to the system:

http://www.geocities.com/microcartography/momiji.html

and be careful when setting up moon bases:

http://www.geocities.com/microcartograp ... cadef.html

and then they changed the planet names:

Sun: Aton official
1. Chrono
2. Micras (moons: Tarsica) official
3. Inferia
4. Indigo (moons: Plateau, Ivory) adopted
5. NI (moons: Fenrir, Lukedu)
6. Yavin
7. Superial
8. Monkey renamed to Momiji and adopted
9. Dyson adopted
10. Gottagobye adopted

and again

1. Chrono changed to Eos (Dawn)
2. Micras (moons: Tarsica)
3. Inferia changed to Pyros (Fire)
4. Indigo
5. NI changed to Chrysos (Gold)
6. Yavin changed to Thalassa (Ocean)
7. Superial to Nephele (Cloud)
8. Monkey changed to Glinos (Maple)
9. Dyson changed to Noctis (Night)
10. Gottagobye changed to Opisthe (Hindmost)

and i noticed this:

We need to be really careful with something like a "Yavin" - those lads at the "New-Empire" might mistake it as a haven for rebels and attack.

no we wouldn't...

also Fax Celestis was designing a star map, this would be useful...

St. Fenix · Post by **St. Fenix** » Tue Aug 22, 2006 8:56 pm

I do believe that we should shift work on the Atos System into the other thread in Administrative Discussion, or move that one here, especially as we need to get some activity going on here.

-St. Fenix

Post by **dr-spangle** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:42 am

yep, i think that the other thread is definately the one that should be carried one, this one isn't as organised

St. Fenix · Post by **St. Fenix** » Wed Aug 23, 2006 8:17 pm

works for me, Let us abandon this thread.

*sweeps documents off tables, throws lighter fluid on everything and sets fire to it*

wait...

meh, I forgot, let us switch threads eh'

-St. Fenix

Post by **dr-spangle** » Thu Aug 24, 2006 6:14 am

okey dokey after you