Claim Reevaluation

Bayen · Post by **Bayen** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:01 pm

Yeah... I think you might remember something about an annex/claim from Tokidoki from a bit back. It was denied because you didn't have an official OK from Gargioullis allowing us to annex his micronation. Well, he posted it a good while back on the thread, and I was wondering if you guys could reevaluate the claim with that in mind...

Post by **dr-spangle** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:25 pm

hmpf... kk

Post by **Craitman** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:18 pm

no actual treaty though?

kingjames · Post by **kingjames** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:30 pm

Craitman wrote:no actual treaty though?

There doesn't have to be a treaty, so long as the other guy has confirmed it, it's done.

Post by **Craitman** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:40 pm

kingjames wrote:
Craitman wrote:no actual treaty though?
There doesn't have to be a treaty, so long as the other guy has confirmed it, it's done.

ok. i just thought the proper way was through a treaty...

Babs · Post by **Babs** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:09 pm

That would be officially, and it would be courtesy to put it in writing, but I would imagine a general 'yeah, take it whatever' would be fine.

Andreas the Wise · Post by **Andreas the Wise** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:51 pm

Hey, it was posted in the thread (in writing), it sounded vaguely official...

Andreas the Wise · Post by **Andreas the Wise** » Sat Jun 23, 2007 5:08 am

dr-spangle wrote:hmpf... kk

Did the Council respond apart from this? There's been a treaty, its a tiny piece of land, all citizens joined Tokidoki ... should be no reason not to allow annexation ...

Post by **dr-spangle** » Sat Jun 23, 2007 5:17 am

Did i move it back into claims?

i should have done...

but when it was no_stamp

i couldn't find it.

reasons:
"expand and annex seperately" is the main one

Iehova · Post by **Iehova** » Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:50 pm

Yes, please do them separately.

Andreas the Wise · Post by **Andreas the Wise** » Sat Jun 23, 2007 8:39 pm

Told Bayen to do them separately ...