Update 10.6 (paint/claims map)

Post by **dr-spangle** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:46 am

www.micromaps.org/maps/claimsmap.png

updates:
new oscland added
monovia removed

Iehova · Post by **Iehova** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 10:15 am

What's happened over at Taesong/Kampong? Half of Kampong is now a different colour to the other half, with splats of different colour all over due to lazy cartography, and the top half of 'SAR' has been cut off thanks to the less than attentive pasting job.

Oh, and that island with the city of Benevolent on looks exactly the same colour as Stormark.

Post by **Pete** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 10:20 am

I have corrected it, I just need to upload it..

Post by **dr-spangle** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:25 pm

sorry

i was rushing because i have an english essay due in on monday and pete was busy argueing with me..

oh the wrong colour thing... i see why that happened... i sorta used the colour getter tool and missed the island that was the right colour and hit the ocean... i didn't notice much though... wondered why it looked sea colour..

it was global warming!

and the SAR bit... i've fixed it, sorry i accidently removed the SARs from Taesong... i guess you need it for the asian theme

Post by **Craitman** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:54 pm

Iehova wrote:due to lazy cartography

new cartographer needed?

dr-spangle wrote:sorry i accidently removed the SARs from Taesong... i guess you need it for the asian theme

quick thinking, i like it

Zatriarch Maximillideus · Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:48 pm

Very nice. And Monovia removed! Well, well- I should be seeing some new neighbours in my backyard soon!
Let's hope they're nice.

Also, I've noticed a small island near Benacia seemingly unchanged since the CIS left its old stomping-grounds near Shireroth.
It's near where Ironmantle/Tchistanski used to be, if you remember, spangle.

Colonel Vilhelm · Post by **Colonel Vilhelm** » Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:27 pm

Man, that is one tiny island! How did you spot that, Big Z?

Zatriarch Maximillideus · Mon Apr 16, 2007 2:43 am

I was looking at possible colonial claims, then I says to meself 'look at that island! I'd better post about it in the MCS forum like a good admin!'
And here I am.
Or perhaps it's part of an evil CIS plot to retain influence on Benacia

Post by **dr-spangle** » Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:50 am

it's our island... leave it be. :P

we take pride in that island... i have plans to expand over there... and de-expand a little on the mainland to make it all even

Zatriarch Maximillideus · Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:06 pm

and de-expand a little on the mainland to make it all even

Phew... I was getting a bit worried back there until you said that ^

Post by **dr-spangle** » Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:18 pm

why? would 244 pixels be some sort of lovlian expansion?

Zatriarch Maximillideus · Mon Apr 16, 2007 5:49 pm

Only joking, Spangle

I see no reason for you not to keep your historic island.

St. Fenix · Post by **St. Fenix** » Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:50 pm

When you have a Chance Spangle, we need to speak specifically upon the subject of your CIS mainland De-expansion.

Catch me on MSN when you are able.

-St. Fenix

Colonel Vilhelm · Post by **Colonel Vilhelm** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 6:12 am

Fenix? MSN? You must be joking, comrade!

You missed a good two hours evil plotting last night.

Post by **Craitman** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 6:13 am

Colonel Vilhelm wrote:evil plotting

and you didn't invite me?

Zatriarch Maximillideus · Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:47 am

Oh, it was so evil only Matbaics and their allies were allowed to partake in it. The evil shall be seen soon enough, I assure you

Post by **Craitman** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:08 am

Zatriarch Maximillideus wrote:Matbaics and their allies

if only you'd sign our treaty earlier

Colonel Vilhelm · Post by **Colonel Vilhelm** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:50 am

It has to be ratified by the Khanaushia. Hold your horses, young one! =P

Post by **Craitman** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 10:42 am

i know, it's quite a good idea to have the citizens' imputs on such relations

Zatriarch Maximillideus · Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:44 pm

And very positive the citizen input on the treaty is too

Post by **Craitman** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:44 pm

a unanimous "Yes" at the moment. how long does the vote last exactly?

St. Fenix · Post by **St. Fenix** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:48 pm

a unanimous "Yes" at the moment. how long does the vote last exactly?

a week once we are done discussing it.

so it may be awhile.

-St. Fenix

Zatriarch Maximillideus · Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:52 pm

Not necessarily. There's no legislation saying we have to debate the motion for a week.

Post by **Craitman** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:54 pm

so it's finished when it's finished then...

St. Fenix · Post by **St. Fenix** » Tue Apr 17, 2007 5:55 pm

truly? that is something I would have liked to know quite awhile back.

either way, I believe it shall go through soon enough.

-St. Fenix